Ghusl is an Arabic word which means full ablution in Islam. Ghusl or bathing becomes necessary for any adult Muslim after having sexual intercourse, any sexual discharge or completion of menstrual cycle, giving birth or death by natural causes. Followings are some selected Hadis from Sahi Bukhari which put light on the method and importance of Ghusl in Islam.
Narrated `Aisha: Whenever the Prophet took a
bath after Janaba he started by washing his hands and then
performed ablution like that for the prayer. After that he would
put his fingers in water and move the roots of his hair with
them, and then pour three handfuls of water over his head and
then pour water all over his body.
1.249:
Narrated Maimuna: (the wife of the Prophet)
Allah’s Apostle performed ablution like that for the prayer but
did not wash his feet. He washed off the discharge from his
private parts and then poured water over his body. He withdrew
his feet from that place (the place where he took the bath) and
then washed them. And that was his way of taking the bath of
Janaba.
1.250:
Narrated `Aisha:
The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot called
‘Faraq’.
1.251:
Narrated Abu Salama: `Aisha’s brother and I went
to `Aisha and he asked her about the bath of the Prophet. She
brought a pot containing about a Sa` of water and took a bath and
poured it over her head and at what time there was a screen
between her and us.
1.252:
Narrated Abu Ja`far: While I and my father were
with Jabir bin `Abdullah, some People asked him about taking a
bath He replied, “A Sa` of water is sufficient for you.” A man
said, “A Sa` is not sufficient for me.” Jabir said, “A Sa was
sufficient for one who had more hair than you and was better than
you (meaning the Prophet).” And then Jabir (put on) his garment
and led the prayer.
1.253:
Narrated Ibn `Abbas: The Prophet and Maimuna
used to take a bath from a single pot.
1.254:
Narrated Jubair bin Mut`im: Allah’s Apostle
said, “As for me, I pour water three times on my head.” And he
pointed with both his hands.
1.255:
Narrated Jabir bin `Abdullah: The Prophet used
to pour water three times on his head.
1.256:
Narrated Abu Ja`far: Jabir bin `Abdullah said to
me, “Your cousin (Hasan bin Muhammad bin Al−Hanafiya) came to me
and asked about the bath of Janaba. I replied, ‘The Prophet uses
to take three handfuls of water, pour them on his head and then
pour more water over his body.’ Al−Hasan said to me, ‘I am a
hairy man.’ I replied, ‘The Prophet had more hair than you’.
”
1.257:
Narrated Maimuna: I placed water for the bath of
the Prophet. He washed his hands twice or thrice and then poured
water on his left hand and washed his private parts. He rubbed
his hands over the earth (and cleaned them), rinsed his mouth,
washed his nose by putting water in it and blowing it out, washed
his face and both forearms and then poured water over his body.
Then he withdrew from that place and washed his feet.
Narrated Maimuna:
I placed water for the bath of Allah’s Apostle and he poured
water over his hands and washed them twice or thrice; then he
poured water with his right hand over his left and washed his
private parts (with his left hand). He rubbed his hand over the
earth and rinsed his mouth and washed his nose by putting water
in it and blowing it out. After that he washed his face, both
fore arms and head thrice and then poured water over his body. He
withdrew from that place and washed his feet.
1.266:
Narrated Maimuna bint Al−Harith: I placed water
for the bath of Allah’s Apostle and put a screen. He poured water
over his hands, and washed them once or twice. (The sub−narrator
added that he did not remember if she had said thrice or not).
Then he poured water with his right hand over his left one and
washed his private parts. He rubbed his hand over the earth or
the wall and washed it. He rinsed his mouth and washed his nose
by putting water in it and blowing it out. He washed his face,
forearms and head. He poured water over his body and then
withdrew from that place and washed his feet. I presented him a
piece of cloth (towel) and he pointed with his hand (that he does
not want it) and did not take it.
1.267:
Narrated Muhammad bin Al−Muntathir: on the
authority of his father that he had asked `Aisha (about the
Hadith of Ibn `Umar). She said, “May Allah be Merciful to Abu
`Abdur−Rahman. I used to put scent on Allah’s Apostle and he used
to go round his wives, and in the morning he assumed the Ihram,
and the fragrance of scent was still coming out from his body.”
Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab was a
religious scholar and conservative reformer whose teachings were
elaborated by his followers into the doctrines of Wahhabism. Ibn
Abd alWahhab was born in the small town of Uyayna located in the
Najd territory of north central Arabia. He came from a family of
Hanbali scholars and received his early education from his
father, who served as judge (qadi) and taught hadith and law at
the local mosque schools. Ibn Abd al-Wahhab left Uyayna at an
early age, and probably journeyed first to Mecca for the
pilgrimage and then continued to Medina, where he remained for a
longer period. Here he was influenced by the lectures of Shaykh
Abdallah b. Ibrahim al-Najdi on the neo Hanbali doctrines of Ibn
Taymiyya.
From Medina, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab traveled to Basra, where he
apparently remained for some time, and then to Isfahan. In Basra
he was introduced directly to an array of mystical (Sufi)
practices and to Shiite beliefs and rituals. This encounter
undoubtedly reinforced his earlier beliefs that Islam had been
corrupted by the infusion of extraneous and heretical influences.
The beginning of his reformist activism may be traced to the time
when he left Basra around 1739 to return to the Najd.
Ibn Abd al-Wahhab rejoined his family in Huraymila, where his
father had recently relocated. Here he composed the small
treatise entitled Kitab al-tawhid (Book of unity), in which he
most clearly outlines his religio-political mission. He
castigates not only the doctrines and practices of Sufism and
Shiism, but also more widespread popular customs common to Sunnis
as well, such as performing pilgrimages to the graves of pious
personages and beseeching the deceased for intercession with God.
More generally, following a line of argument developed much
earlier by Ibn Taymiyya, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab challenged the
authority of the religious scholars (ulema), not only of his own
time, but also the majority of those in preceding generations.
These scholars had injected unlawful innovations (bida) into
Islam, he argued. In order to restore the strict monotheism
(tawhid) of true Islam, it was necessary to strip the pristine
Islam of human additions and speculations and implement the laws
contained in the Quran as interpreted by the Prophet and his
immediate companions. Thus, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab called for the
reopening of ijtihad (independent legal judgment) by qualified
persons to reform Islam, but the end to which his ijtihad led was
a conservative, literal reading of certain parts of the
Quran.
Aspects of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab’s teachings, including asceticism,
simplicity of faith, and emphasis on an egalitarian community,
quickly drew followers to his cause. But his condemnation of the
alleged moral laxity of society, his challenge to the ulema, and
to the political authority that supported them estranged him from
his townspeople and, some claim, even from his own family. In
1740, he returned to his native village of Uyayna, where the
local ruler (amir) Uthman b. Bishr adopted his teachings and
began to act on some of them, such as destroying tombs in the
area. When this activity caused a popular backlash, Ibn Abd
al-Wahhab moved on to Diriyya, a small town in the Najd near
presentday Riyadh. Here he forged an alliance with the amir
Muhammad b. Saud (d. 1765), who pledged military support on
behalf of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab’s religious vocation. Ibn Abd
al-Wahhab spent the remainder of his life in Diriyya, teaching in
the local mosque, counseling first Muhammad b. Saud and then his
son Abd al-Aziz (d. 1801), and spreading his teachings through
followers in the Najd and Iraq.
Akbar the Great
(1542–1605)
Jalal al-Din Akbar was born in 1542 as his father Humayun fled
India before the forces of the Afghan warlord Sher Shah Sur.
After thirteen years of exile, his father returned to rule India,
but died in a fall in a matter of months. Akbar came to the
throne at the age thirteen in 1555. He ruled until his own death
in 1605.
Akbar’s reputation as the true founder of the Mogul empire rests
partly on his own reign of fifty years and partly on the writings
of Abu ’l-Fazl, a loyal companion who was Akbar’s ardent
supporter. Abu ’l-Fazl’s Ain-i Akbari and Akbarnamah presented
the image of Akbar as a political genius. Abu ’l-Fazl saw Akbar
as the “perfect man” (insan-I kamil) of Sufi lore: a master of
both the temporal and spiritual realms. He, therefore, inflated
Akbar’s reputation whenever possible.
In practical terms, Akbar adopted some of the administrative
practices of the defeated Sher Shah. As the influence of his
grandfather and father’s aging courtiers declined, Akbar was free
to recruit a new corps of advisors, like Abu ’l-Fazl. These
advisors depended on his patronage for their own status. During
Akbar’s reign, India saw an influx of silver bullion as European
traders began massive purchases of Indian cloth. Because of the
cash nexus created by increased commerce, Akbar was able to
manage a system in which officials received salaries either
directly from the imperial treasury or through assignments of the
government’s revenue allotment from the capitol of the province
for specific districts.
The central authority gained an unprecedented degree of control
over state officials. Akbar’s reputation was further enhanced as
the British came to rule India. They saw him as a model for their
own style of rule: religiously neutral, but strict in his
assertion of central power.
Ayatollah
Meaning & Definition
The term ayatollah (Ar. ayatollah), literally “Sign of God,”
refers to high-ranking scholars within the Twelver Shiite
tradition. The term emerged in the early modern period (late 19th
century) to describe the elite of the Shiite scholarly community.
In modern works, many early Shiite scholars were
anachronistically given the rank of ayatollah. Ayatollahs are
nearly always experts in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), and are
normally required to have written extensively in this area.
The requirements for qualification as an ayatollah are not
entirely clear in traditional descriptions of the Shiite
hierarchy, though the rank of ijtihad and associated
qualifications of learning are often mentioned. Ijtihad is a
condition, though not everyone who has attained it will be called
“ayatollah.” The vagueness is due to absence of rigid ranks in
the Shiite hierarchy. Before and since the Islamic Revolution in
Iran (1979), the term “grand ayatollah” was used for the “sources
of imitation.” Since the revolution, there has been a tremendous
increase in the use of the term for the Iranian clerical
elite.
Ayatollahs are found at the apex of the scholarly structure,
having studied in traditional seminaries (madrasas) and having
passed through a number of intermediate ranks (among which is
Hojjat al-Islam). A scholar seems to be granted the rank of
ayatollah through general agreement among the scholars. A person
might be referred to as ayatollah by one writer and, when no one
disputes the appellation, most scholars subsequently refer to him
as ayatollah. An ayatollah, theoretically, holds this rank until
he dies, though in recent times, ayatollahs (such as ayatollahs
Shari atmadari and Muntazeri in Iran) have lost their status
after serious disputes with supposedly higher-ranking Ayatollah
Ruhollah Khomeini.
Muhammad ibn
Ismail Al Bukhari Biography
Muhammad b. Ismail al-Bukhari, who was born in Bukhara in central
Asia, compiled the most important hadith collection in Sunni
Islam, called al-Jami al-sahih (The sound Collection). Al-Bukhari
is said to have started to learn hadiths (“the sayings” of the
prophet Muhammad) at about ten years of age, having been blessed
with a remarkably retentive memory and a sharp intellect. At the
age of sixteen, he made the pilgrimage and traveled to Mecca and
Medina to study with well-known hadith teachers there. He next
went to Egypt, and spent the following sixteen years traveling
through much of Asia in the pious pursuit of hadiths. On his
return to Bukhara, he began to scrutinize the roughly 600,000
reports he had collected. He is said to have applied the most
stringent standards in determining the reliability of these
reports, which led him to record only about 7,397 of them. His
painstaking efforts resulted in the Sahih, which by the tenth
century had achieved near universal recognition among Muslims,
who regarded al-Bukhari’s collection as including the most
reliable and sound hadiths attributed to the Prophet, based
particularly on analysis of their chains of transmission.
The Sahih continues to enjoy an almost “canonical” status today,
second only to the Quran in importance as the source for moral
and legal prescriptions. The standard edition in use today was
prepared by Ali b. Muhammad al-Yunini (d. 1302).
Numerous commentaries have been written on the Sahih; in recent
times, partial and complete translations of this collection have
been made in a number of languages. Al-Bukhari died in his
hometown of Bukhara at age sixty.
Asabiya or
Social Solidarity is Islam
The English equivalent of the term asabiyya is akin to “social
solidarity” or “tribal loyalty.” It is an abstract noun that
derives from the Arabic root asab, meaning “to bind.” It refers
to a special characteristic or set of characteristics that defines
the rather vague essence of what constitutes a particular group.
As a sociological principle, it would be important within the
political thought of Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406). Asabiyya, according
to him, is the social bond that is particularly evident among
tribal groups and is based more on social, psychological,
physical, and political factors than on those of genetics or
consanguinity. It is not unique among the Arabs; rather, each
group possesses its own distinct asabiyya. In this way, Ibn
Khaldun identified a Jewish asabiyah, a Greek asabiyya, and so on.
He also perceived an intimate connection between asabiyya and
religion. For a religion to be effective it must evoke a feeling
of solidarity among all the members of the group. In this way one
could have diverse asabiyyat; for example, an asabiyah to one’s
tribe, one’s guild, and ultimately to one’s religion. Ibn Khaldun
argues that Islam brought a strong sense of asabiyya to the Arabs
and was responsible for the benefits that Islamic civilization
produced.
Calligraphy In Islam
Muslims have always deemed calligraphy, the art of beautiful
writing, the noblest of the arts. The first chapters of the Quran
revealed to the prophet Muhammad in the early seventh century
(suras 96 and 68) mention the pen and writing. Writing in Arabic
script soon became a hallmark of Islamic civilization, found on
everything from buildings and coins to textiles and ceramics, and
scribes and calligraphers became the most honored type of artist.
We know the names, and even the biographies, of more
calligraphers than any other type of artist. Probably because of
the intrinsic link between writing and the revelation, Islamic
calligraphy is meant to convey an aura of effortlessness and
immutability, and the individual hand and personality are
sublimated to the overall impression of stateliness and grandeur.
In this way Islamic calligraphy differs markedly from other great
calligraphic traditions, notably the Chinese, in which the
written text is meant to impart the personality of the
calligrapher and recall the moment of its creation. Islamic
calligraphy, by contrast, is timeless.
The reed pen (qalam) was the writing implement par excellence in
Islamic civilization. The brush, used for calligraphy in China
and Japan, was reserved for painting in the Islamic lands. In
earliest times Muslim calligraphers penned their works on
parchment, generally made from the skins of sheep and goats, but
from the eighth century parchment was gradually replaced by the
cheaper and more flexible support of paper. From the fourteenth
century virtually all calligraphy in the Muslim lands was written
on paper. Papermakers developed elaborately decorated papers to
complement the fine calligraphy, and the colored, marbled, and
gold-sprinkled papers used by calligraphers in later periods are
some of the finest ever made.
Almost all Islamic calligraphy is written in Arabic script. The
Quran was revealed in that language, and the sanctity of the
revelation meant that the script was adopted for many other
languages, such as new Persian, Ottoman Turkish, and Urdu. Unlike
many other scripts that have at least two distinct forms of
writing—a monumental or printed form in which the letters are
written separately and a cursive or handwritten form in which
they are connected—Arabic has only the cursive form, in which
some, but not all, letters are connected and assume different
forms depending on their position in the word (initial, medial,
final, and independent). The cursive nature of Arabic script
allowed calligraphers to develop many different styles of
writing, which are usually grouped under two main headings:
rectilinear and rounded. Since the eighteenth century, scholars
have often called the rectilinear styles “Kufic,” after the city
of Kufa in southern Iraq, which was an intellectual center in
early Islamic times. This name is something of a misnomer, for as
yet we have no idea which particular rectilinear style this name
denoted.
Scholars have proposed various other names to replace kufic,
including Old or Early Abbasid style, but these names are not
universally accepted, in part because they carry implicit
political meanings, and many scholars continue to use the term
kufic. Similarly, scholars often called the rounded styles naskh,
from the verb nasakha (to copy). The naskh script is indeed the
most common hand used for transcription and the one upon which
modern styles of typography are based, but the name is also
something of a misnomer, for it refers to only one of a group of
six rounded hands that became prominent in later Islamic times.
As with kufic, scholars have proposed several other names to
replace naskh, such as new style (often abbreviated N.S.), or new
Abbasid style, but these names, too, are not universally
accepted.
Medieval sources mention the names of many other calligraphic
hands, but so far it has been difficult, even impossible, to
match many of these names with distinct styles of script. Very
few sources describe the characteristics of a particular style or
give illustrations of particular scripts. Furthermore, the same
names may have been applied to different styles in different
places and at different times. Hence it may never be possible to
link the names of specific scripts given in the sources with the
many, often fragmentary, manuscripts at hand, especially from the
early period. Both the rectilinear and the rounded styles were
used for writing from early Islamic times, but in the early
period the rounded style seems to have been a book hand used for
ordinary correspondence, while the rectilinear style was reserved
for calligraphy. Although no examples of early calligraphy on
parchment can be sensitively dated before the late ninth century,
the importance of the rectilinear style in early Islamic times is
clear from other media with inscriptions, such as coins,
architecture, and monumental epigraphy. The Fihrist by Ibn
al-Nadim (d. 995) records the names of calligraphers who worked
in the Umayyad and Abbasid periods, and both coins and the
inscriptions on the first example of Islamic architecture, the
Dome of the Rock erected in Jerusalem by the Umayyad caliph Abd
al-Malik in 692, show that from earliest times Umayyad
calligraphers applied such aesthetic principles as balance,
symmetry, elongation, and stylization to transform ordinary
writing into calligraphy. Calligraphers in early Islamic times
regularly used the rectilinear styles to transcribe manuscripts
of the Quran. Indeed, the rectilinear styles might be deemed
Quranichands, for we know only one other manuscript—an
un-identified genealogical text in Berlin (Staatsbibliotheque no.
379) written in a rectilinear script. None of these early
manuscriptsof the Quran is signed or dated, and most survive only
in fragmentary form, and so scholars are still refining other
methods, both paleographic and codicological, to group and
localize the scripts used in these early parchment manuscripts of
the Quran.
The major change in later Islamic times was the gradual adoption
and adaptation of round hands for calligraphy. From the ninth
century calligraphers transformed the round hands into artistic
scripts suitable for transcribing the Quran and other prestigious
texts. The earliest surviving copy of the Quran written in a
rounded hand is a small manuscript, now dispersed but with the
largest section preserved in the Chester Beatty Library in Dublin
(ms. 1417). It bears a note in Persian saying that the manuscript
was corrected by a certain Ahmad ibn Ali ibn Abu ’l-Qasm
al-Khayqani in June 905, and it is tacitly accepted that the
rounded hand was developed in Iran or nearby Iraq, heartland of
the Abbasid caliphate. In the ensuing centuries calligraphers
continued to develop and elaborate the rounded style, and from
the fourteenth century virtually all manuscripts of the Quran
were written in one of the six round scripts known as the Six
Pens (Arabic, al-aqlam al-sitta; Persian, shish qalam). These
comprise three pairs of majuscule-miniscule hands, thuluth-naskh,
muhaqqaq-rayhan, and tawqi-riqa, and calligraphers delighted in
juxtaposing the different scripts, particularly the larger and
smaller variants of the same pair.Variousexplanations have been
proposed for this transformation of rounded book hands into
proportioned scripts suitable for calligraphy fine manuscripts.
These explanations range from the political (e.g., the spread of
orthodox Sunni Islam) to the socio-historical (e.g., the new role
of the chancery scribe as copyist and calligrapher), but perhaps
the most convincing are the practical. The change from
rectilinear to rounded script coincided with the change from
parchment to paper, and the new style of writing might well be
connected with a new type of reed pen, a new method of sharpening
the nib, or a new way that the pen was held, placed on the page,
or moved across it. In the same way, the adoption of paper
engendered the adoption of a new type of black soot ink (midad)
that replaced the dark brown, tannin-based ink (hibr) used on
parchment. From the fourteenth century calligraphers,
especially those in the eastern Islamic lands, developed more
stylized forms of rounded script. The most distinctive is the
hanging script known as nastaliq, which was particularly suitable
for transcribing Persian, in which many words end in letters with
large bowls, such as ya or ta. Persian calligraphers commonly
used nastaliq to pen poetic texts, in which the rounded bowls at
the end of each hemistich form a visual chain down the right side
of the columns on a page. They also used nastaliq to pen poetic
specimens (qita). These elaborately planned calligraphic
compositions typically contain a Persian quatrain written in
colored and gold-dusted inks on fine, brightly colored and highly
polished paper and set in elaborately decorated borders. The
swooping strokes of the letters and bowls provide internal rhythm
and give structure to the composition. In contrast to the
anonymous works of the early period, these calligraphic specimens
are frequently signed and dated, and connoisseurs vied to
assemble fine collections, which were often mounted in splendid
albums.
Calligraphy continues to be an important art form in modern times, despite the adoption of the Latin alphabet in some countries such as Turkey. Some calligraphers are trying to revive the traditional styles, notably the Six Pens, and investigate and rediscover traditional techniques and materials. Societies teaching calligraphy flourish. The Anjuman-e Khushnvisan-e Iran (Society of Iranian Calligraphers), for example, has branches in all the main cities of the country, with thousands of students. Other artists are extending the calligraphic tradition to new media, adopting calligraphy in new forms, ranging from three-dimensional sculpture to oil painting on canvas. More than any other civilization, Islam values the written word.
ALLAH Meaning
& Definitions
Allah is the Arabic equivalent of the English word God, and is
the term employed not only among Arabic-speaking Muslims but by
Christians and Jews and in Arabic translations of the Bible. A
contraction of al-ilah, meaning “the god,” Allah is cognate with
the generic pan-Semitic designation for “God” or “deity”
(Israelite/Canaanite El, Akkadian ilu) and is particularly close
to the common Hebrew term Elohim and the less frequent Eloah. It
is thus, strictly speaking, not a proper name but a title.
In the Islamic context, as in Jewish and Christian usage, Allah
refers to the one true God of monotheism. This is how the term
occurs in the shahada or “profession of faith,” the simplest,
earliest, and most basic of Islamic creeds, in the first part of
which the believer affirms that there is no “god” (ilah) but “God”
or “the god” (Allah). However, the shahada itself seems to imply
that Allah was already known to the first audience of the Islamic
revelation, and that they were called upon to repudiate other
deities. And this is precisely the picture given in the Quran.
“If you ask them who created them,” the Quran informs the prophet
Muhammad regarding his pagan critics, “they will certainly say
‘Allah.’” (43:87; compare 10:31; 39:38). Pagan Arabs swore oaths
by Allah (as witnessed at 6:109; 16:38; 35:42).
Pre-Islamic Arabs believed in supernatural intercessors with God
(10:18; 34:22), for whom they appeared to claim warrant from
Allah. Indeed, Allah seems (in their view) to have headed a
pantheon of pre-Islamic deities or supernatural beings, not
altogether unlike El’s rule over the Canaanite pantheon, and,
like El, he seems to have been rather distant and aloof. While
the data are fragmentary and open to some question, pre-Islamic
Arabs seem to have paid more attention to Allah’s daughters and
to the jinn (or genies) than to him. Even the Quran seems to
concede genuine existence to a divine retinue (as at 7:191–195;
10:28–29; 25:3). However, just as the Canaanite gods are replaced
by an angelic court in Israelite faith, Islam rejects the
independent deities of pagan Arabia in favor of a very much
subordinated “exalted assembly” (see 37:8; 38:69) that exists to
carry out the decrees of the one true God, who is, says the
Quran, nearer to the individual human than that person’s jugular
vein (50:16). In this, as in other respects, Islam regards itself
as a restoration of the religion taught by earlier prophets but
marred by successive human apostasies (see 42:13).
The Quran identifies Allah as the creator, sustainer, and
sovereign of the heavens and the earth. (See, for example, 13:16;
29:61, 63; 31:25; 39:38; 43:9, 87.) Following the scriptural
text, Muslims characterize him by the ninety-nine “most beautiful
names” (7:180; 17:110; 20:8), which serve to identify his
attributes. (Eventually, repetition of and meditation upon these
names became an important practice in the tradition of Sufi
mysticism.) They portray a being who is selfsufficient,
omnipotent, omniscient, eternal, merciful yet just, benevolent
but terrible in his wrath. The picture of Allah in the Quran
employs distinctly anthropomorphic language (referring, for
example, to the divine eyes, hands, and face), which, virtually
all commentators have long agreed, are to be taken
figuratively.
Allah has revealed himself throughout history via messages to
various prophets by means of both the seemingly routine processes
of nature and the periodic judgments and catastrophes directed
against the rebellious. He will reveal himself even more
spectacularly at the end of time when, as judge of humankind, he
pronounces doom or blessing upon every individual who has ever
lived. The faith of Muhammad and the Quran is centered on
absolute “submission” (islam) to his will.
The Quran describes God as “Allah, one; Allah, the eternal
refuge. He does not beget nor is He begotten, and there is none
equal to Him” (112:1–4). In subsequent Islamic Thought, such
straightforward denial of divine family life (probably aimed at
both the pre-Islamic pantheon and Christian concepts of God the
Father and God the Son) was expanded into a much broader doctrine
of the divine unity, denoted by the non-Quranic word tawhid
(“unification” or “making one”). Philosophers and theologians
debated such Questions as whether God’s attributes were identical
to God’s essence, or whether, being multiple, they must be
additional and in a sense external in order not to compromise the
utter and absolute simplicity of the divine essence. They debated
how the undeniably manifold cosmos had emerged out of the pure
oneness of God.
The issue of whether God’s speech (i.e., the Quran) was coeternal
with him, or subsidiary and created, rising to political
prominence in the second and third centuries after Muhammad. The
overwhelming personality depicted in the revelations of Muhammad
became the Necessary Existent (wajib al-wujud), and the obvious
dependence of life on his will (particularly apparent in the
harsh desert environment of Arabia) was taken to point to the
utter contingency of all creation upon a God who brought it into
being out of nothing. Perhaps not unrelated was the rise to
dominance in Islam of a doctrine of predestination or
determinism, which had obvious roots in the Quran itself (as, for
example, at 13:27; 16:93; 74:31). In the meantime, though, while
the philosophers were elaborating a view of Allah tending to
extreme transcendence, Sufi theoreticians were emphasizing his
immanence and experiential accessibility and, in practice, often
breaking down the barrier between Creator and creatures—and
occasionally shocking their fellow Muslims.
The famous “Throne Verse” (2:255) offers a fine summary of basic
Islamic teaching regarding God: “Allah!There is no god but he,
the Living, the Everlasting. Neither slumber nor sleep seizes
him. His are all things in the heavens and the earth. Who is
there who can intercede with him, except by his leave? He knows
what is before them and what is behind them, while they
comprehend nothing of his knowledge except as he wills. His
throne extends over the heavens and the earth. Sustaining them
does not burden him, for he is the Most High, the Supreme.” The
depth of Muslim devotion to Allah is apparent virtually
everywhere in Islamic life, including even the use of elaborate
calligraphic renditions of the word as architectural and artistic
ornamentation.
Al Aqsa Mosque or Masjid Al Aqsa is the third holliest site in Islam. It is located in old city of Jerusalem. This silver doomed mosque along with Dome of the Rock also referred to as Al-Haram Ash Sharif. Al Aqsa mosque has capacity of over 5000 people and it has four large minarets along with amazing golden doom. Here are some expertly designed wallpaper of Masjid Al Aqsa which you can download free here.
Al Aqsa Mosque Wallpapers
Download these hd picture of al Aqsa mosque free from here;
Al-Masjid Al-Nabawi (Arabic word which means “Mosque of Prophet”) is second most sacred place for Muslims after Kaaba Sharif. It is situated in Madina and one of the largest mosques in the world. It was established in 622 by Holy Prophet PBUH. We have designed some latest hd wallpapers of Masjid Nabavi (also known as Prophet’s Mosque). Check out these amazing pictures of Masjid Nabawi and download them free. Keep remember us in your prayers and we appreciate your feedback.
Masjid Nabvi Wallpapers