The titters on Wall Street about the administrations China Plan are
contagious. According to the Wall Street Journal, the titters
spread through the audience yesterday at Peking University when
TurboTax Tim Geithner went there to banter about the economic
relations between the two countries.ppChinas not having a
recessionmdashtheyre still showing economic growth. As a
consequence, the Chinese have acquired billions of dollars from
exports, dollars which they are using to buy U.S. debt issues.
Naturally, the Chinese are as interested as we are that things
should go well in the U.S. However much the Chinese may be lacking
in some comforts, they are not nearly as willfully blind as many
Americans when it comes to economic matters. That is probably
because most Chinese must struggle harder for daily existence than
we do. In the U.S., the understanding of hard times has a much
different meaning than it does in other parts of the world.
ppEveryone has heard the word bailout but many Americans have dinky
interest in what that means in terms of the entire economic
picture. The giggles at Geithners expense were because the Chinese
know that the U.S. is digging a large monetary hole with its
stimulus plansmdashGM and Chrysler bailouts, AIG, the Grand Banks,
the UAW, cap and trade, social security and Medicare deficits, and
a planned program of universal health care. The Chinese may mediate
were doomed, or nearly so. They dont want us to be doomed but thats
not out of any particular benevolence toward our national
aspirations. The Chinese are cheering for our economic recovery
because the United States is a major market for Chinese goods,
accounting for a good portion of the Chinese economic expansion.
ppIt is true that the Obama administration plan of pouring billions
into the American economy has had a certain shortterm effect.
Witness the Dow Jones averages which, having experienced a steady
decline since January of 2009 and dropping nearly 500 points on the
day of Obamas inauguration, is now within striking distance of a
breakeven point. Another 50 points or so on the Dow would put the
index into positive territory and President Obamas supporters could
rightly credit his massive spending plans for a revival that other
people would rather call another bubble. Many economists both
inside and outside the U.S. government see other distinct signs of
recovery, particularly in the pattern of bottoming housing prices.
The Obama administration can claim success, too, in the speed with
which Chrysler Corporation moved through its bankruptcy
proceedings. While not completely out of the water, the bankruptcy
court yesterday approved the Fiat acquisition of sizable ownership
in the beleaguered auto manufacturer. The GM bankruptcy is in its
infancy, but there was an early success in GMs sale of Hummer to a
Chinese manufacturer even as the bankruptcy court begins its
process. In terms of size, the GM bankruptcy is gargantuan compared
to that of Chrysler there is more chance of it getting bogged down
by conflicting interests. ppThe Wall Street Journal and other
newspapers relate that the Chinese company bought Hummer for less
than 500 million, a distressed price by any reckoning, proving once
again the Chinese hunger for hard assets and the weak position of
American industry. But thats not solely what caused the Treasury
Secretarys Peking audience to suppress giggles. The Chinese were
smothering their mirth because the combination of a weak dollar,
rising unemployment, huge spending excesses, and rising interest
rates resulting from the Federal Reserve printing money to seize
Treasury bonds will spawn a second wave of economic recession which
could make the first appear benign. ppThats a view held by European
leaders, too. German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned yesterday that
U.S. Federal Reserve and European Central Bank fiscal strategies of
flooding the market with dollars and euros would create dangerous
worldwide inflation. Keep in mind that German Chancellors are not
historically very much inclined to even speak publicly of central
bank policies. ppThe Chinese are also worried, as we are, that they
are losing dollar strength in the U.S. investments. Of course, the
U.S. government wants a weak dollar so that other countries can
afford to rob American goods in the hope that this will speed a
recovery. Unfortunately, a weak dollar also means higher commodity
prices which, in turn, translates to higher oil prices. The Obama
administration welcomes higher oil costs, too, because it fits with
the administration conception for Government Motors to produce
light, smaller cars which will compete with motorcycles and
rickshas for fuel efficiency and green credentials and have similar
safety records. ppTo be utterly candid about it, paying a great
deal of attention to the economy does not make anyone an infallible
predictor of future economic direction. It is for this reason,
perhaps, that most Americans prefer to pay no attention to the
economy at all. Some of the best economic minds in the country
failed to predict the current drastic downturn. Of those who did
warn against the bubble economy, none had any influence on its
direction and most were completely ignored. Yet, there are
practical considerations of concern to allppThe massive spending of
the U.S. government is funded by the issuance of debt. Currently,
the Federal Reserve Bank has had a policy of buying Treasury debt,
a policy it calls quantitative easing. This has pushed up bond
yields and mortgage rates. High mortgage rates could damage the
green shoots of a housing recovery. High mortgage rates makes it
more difficult to buy and sell houses, a important engine of the
national economy. ppUnemployment is what economists call a lagging
economic indicator. This means that the economy will recover long
before unemployment begins to lessen. Most economists say that
unemployment will continue to rise for at least a year before it
begins to fall. The job market is expected to stare bleak
throughout 2009 and into 2010. ppIt may very well be that GM and
Chrysler do not recover at all since success depends on Americans
buying the types of cars which are unprofitable to manufacturers.
To some extent, the U.S. government will determine the operational
direction of these companies based on political and social concerns
rather than profit. The smaller, fuelefficient cars likely to be
produced by GM and Chrysler will be more expensive think Toyota
Prius when gasoline prices were high and less profitable for GM and
Chrysler. That means that Americans could lose the 80 billion
taxpayer dollars already spent on the GM bailout, as well as the
approximately 8 billion on Chrysler. It is an axiom of auto
manufacturing that U.S. automakers come by their profits from
pickup trucks and SUVs. ppThere is political risk, too, in the U.S.
approach to the economic downturn. It is likely that Congress will
resist efforts to close automobile dealers in their districts and
attempt to influence the location of manufacturing plants,
operational changes, wages, benefits, and other activities usually
associated with private enterprise. Congress has already intervened
to cessation GM from manufacturing small cars at a GM owned plant
in China and to recede that production to Michigan. Government
efforts to revive the economy may receive accolades from factional
lobbies who have directly profited from the infusion of dollars,
but the extent of government involvement may mean bad news for real
peoplemdashreal people being the 13.7 million unemployed Americans
counted by the U.S. Labor Department at the end of April 2009. The
Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the number of unemployed
has risen by 6 million people in the past 12 months.
Date Published: