Do you get the same flashing Java Update message on a regular
basis? Seriously, I feel like every week I'm barraged with the
flashing update icon on my task bar - reminding me that something
critical is unfinished! Java - I'd get rid of it if it was not for
the many applications that depend on it's use. Grrrrr!
Java is such a pain in the ass that there is a company now selling
a program for dollarsignr9.99 that will eliminate the nagging. I
refuse to spend the dollarsignr10. I'll suffer without this plug in
before I spend money to stop the nagging updates. If you have lost
your mind to Java's update harassment, you can buy the program
here:
http://www.softwarecandy.com/shop/downloads/stop-java-updates
I'd write a letter to the Java people if I had more time - I'm too
busy updating their bullshit plugin!
Date Published: Mar 31, 2011 - 12:29 pm
Tucson is the "anti Orange County". It truly is an opposite. People
here know they live in a desert and actually like the desert scape
as opposed to large center dividers with beautiful lawns that tell
you that you are living in opulence. Its rock and cactus at every
turn with low lying rooftops, no freeways to get you around - only
40 MPH arteries. To a person coming from So Cal, one would say that
Tucson lacks in the area of presentation. But to me this is a
positive. What Tucson lacks in presentation is made up for in
things that I enjoy more than sprawling lawns on center dividers.
Culture for example. With the University of 40,000 students in the
center of the city, art, culture, and entertainment is more diverse
than any place I've lived. The range of events is astonishing and
they are rarely rooted in a commercial angle (ala Taste of Newport
- "let me promote my restaurant"), but typically rooted in the
tradition itself. For example, a more recent tradition established
in 1990 is the All Souls Procession where a parade, borrowing from
the Mexican holiday, Dia de los Mortos, people dress up in related
garb and march down the very eclectic 4th St. Here is a photo from
that event:
I could go on and on about the museums, art, and events that are
either homegrown or find there way to Tucson. If a concert tour
somehow misses Tucson, Phoenix (the wanna be Orange County) is only
90 minutes away and is never missed (population 5.4 M). There is a
budding wine country just east of Tucson - prime for growth. If I
had the money, I'd be investing in a vineyard there now. Beautiful
mountains line the north end of the City. You can drive there and
be in a beautiful pine forest and/or ski resort in 45 minutes.
Also, you are 45 minutes from the border here, although the
offerings of Nogales are more sparse than the raucous vendors on
Revolucion Blvd in TJ proviide - at least this is what I hear.
Despite the lack of freeways, Tucson has no real traffic. At least
not what I would consider to be traffic. It has dollar cinemas - 2
within a few miles of me. Tucson has the most diverse and
independent dining options I've ever experienced - all within a
short trafficless driving distances. It has a Sushi and Pho
restaurant where I can eat a bowl of Pho at the Sushi bar as a warm
up round. Peruvian, Moroccan, Lebanese, Vegan - and other unique
concepts that are indigenous to Tucson. It has Sunflower - a chain
of organic food stores that offer organic produce at the same if
not lower cost than a regular grocery store (the anti Whole Foods).
The 4th Street grocery Coop has the best selection of loose leaf
teas I've ever seen. Farmers markets are open every day of the week
in different parts of town and even the farthest part of town is
only 20 minutes away. I won't get into the golf which is world
class and very affordable or the 80 degree sunny winter days I've
enjoyed in recent weeks.
People can live here at a low cost and raise a family in a culture
that values good education. The beacon of the U of A, its sports
programs, and world class instruction must be a constant reminder
to the children of the community that advancement in education is
at the very least significant. The lower cost of living translates
to a lower pressure living environment. I attribute strange
occurences to this fact. I've witnessed and participated in
conversations that actually broke out among strangers - even in a
grocery line or gas station - an extreme rarity in So Cal. I'm
accustomed to the ever present scowl of a person that is so pissed
off by asshole drivers that are killing their tight schedule, that
by the time they reach the grocery store line, they are ready to
kill the idiot with 16 items in the 15 items or less line. It's
hard to be nice to you neighbors when they are killing your
schedule by blocking your way in So Cal's massive parking lots -
aka "freeways".
Tucson is like an experiment. The experiment of putting people in a
low pressure cost of living environment combined with every
possible amenity being available in minutes of driving with no
traffic, but please don't tell anyone.
Don't get me wrong, Tucson does have a degree of elitism, but the
stench of it is not omnipresent as I'm accustomed to in CA. It has
crime, but it also has an air of freedom. You know that feeling you
have in CA when a police officer is behind you? You know they are
searching for ANY reason to pull you over. I don't have that
feeling here - ever. They have real criminals to worry about
without having to focus on harassing me or anyone based on
appearances or ridiculous things like seat belts (yes, I do wear my
seat belt at nearly all times) or phones or anything you are doing
in your car with the exception of brandishing a weapon or vodka
bottle. In a way, to be treated with a degree of respect from law
enforcement, makes me feel like a valued citizen. You get respect
from law enforcement here if you treat them with common courtesy.
That's all they want. The thing about a low cost living environment
is that morons can live here too and they are easy for me to avoid,
but not the police - they run into those people far more than they
run into me. So my theory is that the contrast gives well spoken
and courteous people a much greater level of credibility and thus
the "freedom gap" between CA and AZ is immense.
I'm not trying to sell you Tucson - just defend it from the
perspective of those whose eyes are glazed over by the bubble world
of high cost living in disneyesque landscapes that I no longer
value. But, I like it this way. Even with the lack of presentation,
Tucson is and has been one of the fastest growing cities of this
last decade so it needs no promotion or sprawling green center
dividers to increase the ranks of people who love living here. The
lack of OC landscape glamor is helping keep growth manageable and I
hope Tucson continues to value quality of life over pretty
roadways.
Date Published: Mar 21, 2011 - 11:22 am
Social Media will evolve to instant proximate communication using
anonymous RFID or other channels (like Near Field Communication).
The proximity will be needed to have the accuracy of RFID or NFC.
The question is the range of NFC and the development of cell phones
that will be inclusive of peer to peer communication.
I need to understand RFID programming, how to develop it or get it
developed for peer to peer cell phone detection for anonymous
proximity tracking and communication. This is the future of social
media IMO.
Date Published: Mar 11, 2011 - 12:56 pm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/5559934/Automated-Construction-By-Contour-Crafting-Related-Robotics-And-Information-Technologies
Use of Robotics in Home Construction. Why has the cost of housing
not been reduced dramatically through innovation?
Date Published: Mar 11, 2011 - 12:35 pm
Modicum - a small portion of something
Portend - Be a sign or warning that (something, esp. something
momentous or calamitous) is likely to happen.
This is a short list only because I know all remaining words.
Date Published: Sep 09, 2010 - 12:01 pm
If for no other reason than to look back on this issue in 20
years, here are interesting cartoons describing the political
mood with regard to the immigration law controversy:
Date Published: Jun 14, 2010 - 8:49 am
I read a post that suggests that Obama should go to prison for
imposing health care reform on our society:
Should we eliminate Medicare because it is "bankrupt"? How
about our ailing Fire and Police departments? Most cities are
now laying them off for lack of funds. On the same principles,
why not lay them off entirely? Why not get rid of federally
funded meat inspectors and roll the dice with the meat
producers (The Jungle?)?
I agree with anyone that says the government is inefficient but
not nearly as efficient as the big insurance companies that
deny benefits and kill tens of thousands of people in the name
of greater efficiency/profits.
It's a fine line to walk, but we have police and fire
departments for a reason - they preserve lives. One could
reasonably say that based on the principles of freedom that any
taxation or government intervention of any kind is bad. But,
are we better off leaving our health care, police, fire, and
other life saving services in the hands of corporations? How
about the court system? Why not privatize the court system?
Would we get better justice if judges and juries served to
enhance profits by cutting corners on an impartial justice
system?
Yes, it can all be for sale - justice, police protection, fire
protection - just like the preservation of life is now with our
current system that kills 10's of thousands of citizens in the
name of the shareholders who want bigger returns.
So, Obama dares to address the issue. I'm certain there were
many opponents of pulling children out of the public labor pool
in the early 1900's. Doesn't that ring nicely? I'm nostalgic
for a time when children skipped that pesky, government run,
education system and went straight to work at age 6 in some
mine, 10 hours a day. Ah, the good old days before the
government ruined it all by stepping in to stop child
exploitation.
If only you could go back in time to protest that government
intervention and Medicare and the government take over of the
Police and Fire departments. Yep, all these impartial,
government funded entities that protect our rights and lives
are ridiculous and I find it worthy of criminal prosecution to
support any initiative to prevent corporations from offing
citizens by the thousands!
Date Published: Apr 30, 2010 - 4:43 pm
Ah, the good old days when it was a simpler, purer time. Perhaps it
is more true for us as individuals - we were simpler and purer
living in our youths. Here is a great video on the topic of
nostalgia and its use in the media to skew reality:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-january-5-2010/even-better-than-the-real-thing
It's not just funny. Oliver makes a good point about the good ole
days. They really weren't all that good. We have a higher standard
of living. We have more freedom. Of course, we have more evolving
to do as a society, but worshiping the days of old is naive.
Date Published: Jan 23, 2010 - 12:47 pm
The Republican Party is reeling - and it should be when
considering the facts:
George
Bush alienated economic conservatives by being the biggest spender
(percentage of Federal spending increases) in this history of the
Presidency.
He alienated civil libertarians by attacking civil liberties with
the Patriot Act (also typically conservatives).
He alienated social liberals (who might consider themselves
economic conservatives) with a policy that represented bigotry by
attacking the civil liberties of Gay citizens.
But....
At least he had an understanding of his own philosophy. Palin
doesn't have any real understanding of politics, history, global
history, or economics - nor is she interested in learning more (see
excerpts of her book in my Hub, "Sara Palin - Showing a Real
Commitment to Foreign Policy Ignorance" http://hubpages.com/hub/Sara-Palins-Book-Display-a-Real-Commitment-to-Foreign-Policy-Ignorance)
Sara Palin knows how to rehearse lines and read a teleprompter.
She knows how to hire a ghost writer to get a book published. The
fact that she accepted McCain's invitation to run for the Vice
Presidency, or that she would consider running again,
demonstrates her blatant disrespect for the very country that she
is attempting to represent. She of all people knows the depth of
her knowledge of world history, economics, and foreign relations
and she makes no pretense about her lack of knowledge in her
book. She claims that motherhood is a better qualification than
experience with foreign policy or the academic study of
economics.
She offers no real voice to a regenerate a real conservative
movement because she offers no credibility. If the Republican
Party runs her, she will be exposed even more as someone who
needs far more knowledge (intellectual curiosity would help) so
that she can develop a real economic and political philosophy
beyond "going to church and being a mom."
I love moms and church is fine too, but the fact that she's a
parent who goes to church does not qualify her to be fit to
represent the U.S. as a leader of the free world. Conservatives
need a real movement by a person who can articulate a
conservative message of fiscal responsibility and using tax break
incentives to address problems rather than big government. They
have to go back to their roots - not cater only to the religious
right but to the economic conservatives who voted for Barack
Obama because George Bush was the worst deficit spender in
history.
At least Bush, Obama,
McCain, and Gore had an education that enabled them to develop
a philosophy and in the case of Gore and McCain, attempt to
apply their political philosophies on an international stage
with Senatorial experience. Obama, like him or not, has a first
class education and graduated from Harvard where they do study
complex concepts of economics, law, and history.
I don't want to sound like I'm bashing women here. There are
far more qualified women candidates than Palin that the
Republicans could field for a Presidential bid.
Bottom line - the qualifications are transparent and if you
feel she is qualified for the highest offices in the land, you
need to have your head examined.
Date Published: Nov 26, 2009 - 10:24 pm
A good article was written today on the topic:
http://www.quicksprout.com/2009/11/24/the-7-harsh-realities-of-starting-a-business/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+Quicksprout+(Quick+Sprout)&utm_content=Twitter
It speaks to my experience and I respond as follows:
In my world, the vast majority “great” business ideas are tossed
around for some time scrapped before they are ever executed. Very
few ideas are perfect and your haystacks analogy was excellent.
Scrappy entrepreneurs with a shoe string budget are forced to
learn fast when they boldly attempt to execute plans. The market
is the best teacher and you don’t know what you have until you
engage it.
A former business associate of mine used to sum it up with a
statement, "Oh! How good it's gonna be!" - sarcastically.
Without a precursor of sales revenue, no idea deserves to be
spoken of as good, or even horrible – it’s just an untested
theory and it deserves the level of enthusiasm that an untested
theory should bring. I’ve been presented with hundreds of “home
run” business ideas, executed many of my own plans, and succeeded
with 3 (still testing 4) in 10 years of being an
entrepreneur.
Date Published: Nov 25, 2009 - 1:37 pm
In reading an article about Sara Palin's new
book, I couldn't help but be mesmerized by one
paragraph:
In Going
Rogue, Ms. Palin talks perfunctorily about fiscal
responsibility and a muscular foreign policy, and more
passionately about the importance of energy independence, but she
is quite up front about the fact that much of her appeal lies in
her just-folks, “hockey Mom” ordinariness. She pretends no
particular familiarity with the Middle East, the Iraq war or
Islamic politics — 'I knew the history of the conflict,” she
writes, “to the extent that most Americans did.” And she argues
that “there’s no better training ground for politics than
motherhood.”
Imagine if you will, being selected as a Vice
Presidential nominee for the United States in the year 2008. How
arrogant would you have to be, to be satisfied with yourself for
knowing about the Middle East "to the extent that most Americans
did"? How is it easy to justify complete apathy for anything that
smells of thorough knowledge or in depth study of the global
politics with which you might engage as a part of your duty as Vice
President or President of the worlds only remaining super power?
Here is Sara's justification: "there's no better training ground
for politics than motherhood."
I don't have a problem with ignorance until
ignorance becomes negligence. Sara is and was intelligent enough
to study the history and politics of the Middle East and other
major international issues before, during, and after the
campaign. She simply opted out of those pesky tasks because
"motherhood", not the comprehensive study of relevant cultural
and political history, is the ubiquitous qualification for
international relations oversight and foreign policy
development.
Date Published: Nov 14, 2009 - 3:01 pm
Opponents of a government option for health care support the
government run Medicare system more often than not. Ironically, the
only difference between Medicare and a public option is the
requirement of age. So, if you oppose a government run health care
system, then why not oppose Medicare?
Recently the so called conservative alarmists who consistently fail
to address the current health care system failures, have used the
word "rationing" to further frighten those who believe that Obama
plans to force euthanasia upon them within weeks of passing badly
needed health care reform. Here is an article that discusses the
nature of this "rationing" claim:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/25/AR2009082501075.html
If you oppose the public option but believe that Medicare should
exist, then unless you believe in age discrimination, then your
chain of logic may be broken.
If you want to abolish Medicare and the public option (the same
thing without age discrimination) because you believe it is a form
of "rationing", then consider the fact that private sector
practices medical care rationing NOW - 98% of private insurance is
rationed.
This article illuminates the nature of the current buzzword,
"rationing", that is being used by the Nut Wing pundits (Hannity,
Limbaugh, and Beck among others - the trinity of stupidity). Check
it out:
"It's called a conventional fee-for-service plan, where the patient
can elect any service from any provider, and the insurer has to pay
(except for a copayment). And it's been destroyed by market forces.
According to a Kaiser Family Foundation study, in 1988, 73 percent
of people covered by employer-based plans had conventional health
insurance; in 2008, that figure was 2 percent. Why did this happen?
Because private health insurers shifted toward managed-care plans,
primarily preferred provider organizations and health maintenance
organizations, that use either gatekeepers or differential payment
schedules to contain costs. According to Feldstein's definition,
that is, private health insurers are rationing."
Spin that one Nut Wingers.
Date Published: Aug 25, 2009 - 9:26 am
Justice - yes
Common Defense - yes
Life - yes*
Date Published: Jul 14, 2009 - 11:46 am