blockquoteemThis is a tremendous setback for the testing of this
complicated security system. ememMuch more troubling is the
confidence in the GBI system that is currently deployed in Alaska
and California. emblockquotecaption id alignalignleft width107
captionWith more nations seeking nuclear weapons and delivery
systems, the Obama administration is more concerned with how many
nuclear weapons we have. Photo DoD img
srchttpcdn2b.examiner.comsitesdefaultfilesstyleslargehash4551missile0.jpg
alt width107 height131 captionWhile patting himself and his
warfighting team on the back over successes inAfghanistan,
President Barack Obama as well as Defense Secretary Robert Gates is
ignoring the recent defense failure on Wednesday.divA longrange
interceptor missile fired by the U.S. militaryfailed tohit
andneutralizeits target in a test over the Pacific Ocean.divdivMany
military and security experts are wondering when Obama and Gates
will stop worrying about treaties like START and startmaking
certain what weapons systems we do have are operating properly,
said political strategist Mike Baker.divThe Vandenberg Air Force
Base conducted the missile defense test on Wednesday with
disappointing results. It launched a GroundBased Interceptor GBI
missile that failedto destroy an incoming intermediaterange target
missile launched from Kwajalein Atoll.While the White House staff
and the Defense Secretary and military chiefs of staff were silent,
the Pentagons Missile Defense Agency MDAspokesman Richard Lehner
issued a statement Program officials will conduct an extensive
investigation to determine the cause of the failure to intercept
the target.The next flight test will be determined after
identification of the cause of the failure, Lehner
added.Unfortunately, according to defense experts, the GBI is the
only longrange missile the U.S. possesses. And this latest test is
the third major failure in two years and thefirst test
firingconductedin January 2010 also failed to take out its
target.U.S. military and intelligence agencies have testified in
Congressional hearings that the ballistic missile threat to the
United States from North Korea is real and that Iran could have a
capability as early as 2015 to strike the U.S. homeland. There are
GroundBased Interceptors GBI deployed today that the Administration
has deemed necessary to protect our nation from longrange ballistic
missile threats. These deployed GBIs also help dissuade North Korea
and Iran from developing longrange missiles that could strike the
U.S.Lehner said that both the longrange and intermediaterange
missiles werelaunched properly with all radar and sensor systems
operating. However, the longrange missile failed to kill its
target.This is a tremendous setback for the testing of this
complicated system. Much more troubling is the confidence in the
GBI system that is currently deployed in Alaska and California. The
thirty deployed interceptors have a similar configuration to the
one in todays test, said Riki Ellison, chairman and founder of the
Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance.Modernization of the GBI system
would seem to be necessary, as well as a strong look at the testing
culture and environment, Ellison added.divSTART MAY BECOME AMERICAS
FINISHdivdivAccording to Frank Gaffney, head of Center for Security
Policy, the new S.T.A.R.T. is bad for America becausedivdiv It
forces the U.S. to reduce its stockpile of nuclear weapons, and
makes our existing nuclear arsenal unreliabledivdiv It gravely
reduces the ability of the U.S. to defend itself by banning the use
of missiles to shoot down incoming missilesdivdiv It compromises
our sovereignty by creating a Bilateral Consultative
Commissionwhich could open the U.S. up to more restrictions without
Senate approvaldivdiv It requires sharing missile defense secrets
with Russiawho could then use that intelligence against us, or
share it with rogue nationsdivdiv It abandons the trust but verify
monitoring deal with Russia, undermining our ability to know what
kind of missiles they are developing and testingdivdiv It forces
the U.S. to eliminate as many as 150 delivery vehicles, even though
they may be used for transporting conventional weapons, so it harms
other military actionsand it allows Russia to ADD more than 130!div
It does nothing to address the danger of nuclear terrorism,
ignoring the threats we face from Iran and North Korea
Date Published: