Summary: Wikileaks illegal say most Americans in new poll

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Photo: National Ledger Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Photo: National Ledger
A sizable 69% to 18% of all adults agree that “publishing these documents could pose a security threat to the United States and therefore should be illegal,” according to a newly released BBC World News America/ Harris Poll of 2,019 U.S. adults surveyed online between December 17 and 21, 2010 by Harris Interactive.
The July 2010, October 2010 and the November 2010 leaks of almost 500,000 classified documents posted on the Internet web site Wikileaks regarding the ongoing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq provides a cogent example of the inherent risks involved when granting an individual a security clearance. To ameliorate these risks, government agencies rely on a multi-phased personnel security clearance process, according to a report obtained by the National Association of Chiefs of Police.
Read more on Wikileaks illegal say most Americans in new poll…
Related Posts:
caption id alignalignleft width210 captionWikileaks founder Julian
Assange. Photo National Ledger Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
Photo National Ledger img
srchttpcdn2b.examiner.comsitesdefaultfilesstyleslargehash13a4JulianAssange6.jpg
alt width210 height170 captionAsizable 69 to 18 of all adults agree
that publishing these documents could pose a security threat to the
United States and therefore should be illegal, according to a newly
releasedBBC World News America Harris Poll of 2,019 U.S. adults
surveyed online between December 17 and 21, 2010 by Harris
Interactive.divThe July 2010, October 2010 and theNovember2010leaks
of almost 500,000 classified documents postedon the Internet web
site Wikileaksregarding the ongoing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq
provides a cogent example of the inherent risks involved when
granting an individual a security clearance. To ameliorate these
risks, government agencies rely on a multiphasedpersonnel security
clearance process, according to a report obtained by the National
Association of Chiefs of Police.divblockquoteSome of the other main
findings of this poll areul typediscliA 47 to 39 plurality of all
adults disagree that WikiLeaks is helping to provide transparency
in government which is important and goodliliA 48 to 39 plurality
disagrees that publishing these documents could be embarrassing or
hurtful to any given administration, but its not dangerousliliWhen
it comes to the role of the media, the public is split between the
39 of all adults who agree and the 43 who disagree that all
investigative journalism should be regulated by government
and,liliOn one issue there is a very clear answer by more than
4to1, a 62 majority believes that the government should keep some
secrets for national security, international diplomacy and other
reasons as opposed to only 13 who believe that the government
should keep no secrets at all....liulblockquotePerhaps the best
indication of how the public is divided by some of the issues
raised by the WikiLeaks debate is the three way split regarding who
should decide what can and cannot be publicly released. Just over
one third, 35, think the government should regulate what is
released. One third, 32, thinks that each media outlet should
decide what to publish and one third, 33, say they are not sure.The
poll also finds that Democrats and Independents are somewhat more
likely than Republicans to support the right to release and publish
government documents, and that younger people are much more likely
than older people to do so.Since the Wikileaks incidents,the
Pentagon has put in place methods to minimize such thefts of
classified materials. It is now much more difficult for a
determined actor to get access to and move information outside of
authorized channels, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said in a
written statement.
Date Published: