Feed: Breaking: CIA officer arrested for leaking classified material - AggScore: 13.1

Breaking: CIA officer arrested for leaking classified material

---

blockquoteemAlthough the journalist is not named in the indictment, it is believed he is New York Times reporter James Risen, who was subpoenaed to testify about his confidential sources for his book State of War The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration.emblockquotecaption id alignalignleft width210 captionA former CIA operations officer was arrested today. Photo NACOP img srchttpcdn2b.examiner.comsitesdefaultfilesstyleslargehashfc23arrest19.jpg alt width210 height167 captionIn a criminal case that is beginning to rock the Washington, DCbased intelligence community,a former Central Intelligence Agencyofficer was arrested today on charges that he illegally disclosed national defense information and obstructed justice Theformer operationsofficer wastaken intofederal custodyin St. Louis and is expected to made his initial appearance this afternoon before Judge Terry I. Adelman in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.Jeffrey Alexander Sterlingis charged in a 10count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia. Sterling, 43, is chargedwith six counts of unauthorized disclosure of national defense information, and one count each of unlawful retention of national defense information, mail fraud, unauthorized conveyance of government property and obstruction of justice.According to the indictment, Sterling was employed by the CIA from May 1993 to January 2002. From November 1998 through May 2000, he was assigned to a classified clandestine operational program designed to conduct intelligence activities related to the weapons capabilities of certain countries.During that same time frame, he was also the operations officer assigned to handle a human asset associated with that program. According to the indictment, Sterling was reassigned in May 2000, at which time he was no longer authorized to receive or possess classified documents concerning the program or the asset or informant.In connection with his employment, the indictment alleges that Sterling, who is an attorney, signed various security, secrecy and nondisclosure agreements in which he agreed never to disclose classified information to unauthorized persons, acknowledged that classified information was the property of the CIA, and also acknowledged that the unauthorized disclosure of classified information could constitute a criminal offense.According to the indictment, these agreements alsoprovided the suspect with theproper procedures to follow if Sterling had concerns that the CIA had engaged in any unlawful or improper conduct that implicated classified information. These procedures permit such concerns to be addressed while still protecting the classified nature of the information. The media, according to the indictment, was not an authorized party to receive such classified information under such circumstances.The indictment alleges that Sterling, in retaliation for the CIAs refusal to settle on terms favorable to him in the civil and administrative claims he was pursuing against the CIA, engaged in a scheme to disclose information concerning the classified operational program and the human asset first, in connection with a possible newspaper story to be written by an author employed by a national newspaper in early 2003 and, later, in connection with a book published by the author in January 2006.Although the journalist is not named in the indictment, it is believed he is New York Times reporter James Risen, who was subpoenaed to testify about his confidential sources for his book State of War The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration.The indictment unsealed today alleges that Jeffrey Sterling violated his oath to protect classified information and then obstructed an investigation into his actions. Through his alleged actions, Sterling placed at risk our national security and the life of an individual working on a classified mission, said Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer.Our national security requires that sensitive information be protected, said U.S. Attorney NeilMacBride. The law does not allow one person to unilaterally decide to disclose that information to someone not cleared to receive it. Those who handle classified information know the law and must be held accountable when they break it.blockquotestrongIndictment Allegations strongThe indictment alleges that Sterling took a number of steps to facilitate the disclosure of the classified information, includingullistealing classified documents and other information from the CIA and unlawfully retaining those documents without the authority of the CIAlilicommunicating by telephone, via email and in person with the author in order to arrange for the disclosure of or to disclose classified information to the authorlilimeeting with the author in person to orally disclose classified information to the author and to provide documents containing classified information to the author for review or uselilicharacterizing the classified information in a false and misleading manner as a means of inducing the author to write and publish a story premised on that false and misleading informationlilideceiving and attempting to deceive the CIA into believing that he was a former employee adhering to his secrecy and nondisclosure agreements andlilideliberately choosing to disclose the classified information to a member of the media, knowing that such an individual would not reveal his identity, thereby concealing and perpetrating the scheme.liulblockquoteSpecifically, the indictment alleges that beginning in August 2000, Sterling pursued various administrative and civil actions against the CIA concerning alleged employmentrelated racial discrimination and decisions made by the CIAs Publications Review Board regarding Sterlings efforts to publish his memoirs. According to the indictment, on February 12, 2003, the CIA rejected Sterlings third offer to settle his discrimination lawsuit, which was ultimately dismissed by the court.The indictment alleges that beginning a few weeks later, in February and March 2003, Sterling made various telephone calls to the authors residence, and emailed the author a newspaper article about the weapons capabilities of a nation identified in the indictment asemCountry Aem.According to the indictment, while the possible newspaper article containing the classified information Sterling allegedly provided ultimately was not published in 2003, Sterling and the author remained in touch from December 2003 through November 2005 via telephone and email. The indictment alleges that in January 2006, the author published a book which contained classified information about the program and the human asset.The indictment also alleges that Sterling obstructed justice when, between April and July 2006, he deleted the email he had sent to the author concerning the weapons capabilities of emCountry Aem from his account. According to the indictment, Sterling was aware by June 2003 of an FBI investigation into his disclosure of national defense information, and was aware of a grand jury investigation into the matter by June 2006, when he was served a grand jury subpoena for documents relating to the authors book.The charges of unauthorized disclosure and retention of national defense information each carry maximum penalties of 10 years in prison. The charge of mail fraud carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. The charge of unauthorized conveyance of government property carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. The charge of obstruction of justice carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. Each of these charges also carries a maximum fine of 250,000 or twice the loss or gain associated with the offense.