Feed: Liberals Hate Our Constitution Because It is So Fair - AggScore: 13.0

Liberals Hate Our Constitution Because It is So Fair

---

Hardly ever does a day go by without some form of disparagement being uttered by a liberal Democrat regarding our stately and rocksolid a hrefhttpcanadafreepress.comindex.phparticle32054 targetblankConstitutiona. It is the stout character and survivability of that internationally revered document that those leftwing cretins just cant stomach. They wish to all their supposed deities for it to fail or be found to be incompetent but alas, poor Yorick, it still stands tall.Were the Constitution found to be lacking, a great screech of unbounded joy would ring out of the current personnel now usurping our White House they could run roughshod over all formalities and legal documents and doctrines in their efforts to hand us over to a third world entity with corrupt leaders such as the unscrupulous a hrefhttpcanadafreepress.comindex.phparticle32054 targetblankUnited Nationsa.The very astute and redoubtable David Limbaugh wrote in the GOPUSA The Eagle on January 4, 2011 an article titled, Is the Constitution Senile Commentary on gopusa.com, which outlined the move made by the new congressional Republicans brilliant decision to actually read the entire Constitution aloud on the floor of the a hrefhttpcanadafreepress.comindex.phparticle32054 targetblankCongressa on opening day.On that occasion, it seemed that just about all the Reps, Rs and Ds took part in the process, each speaking one section of the quite simple for such an auspicious and enduring document. Even little Nancy, who was the third in line to emote, which she did like a well schooled fifth grader who had memorized her few lines in the school play. She did it in rapid fire mode and I half expected to see her curtsy and rush back to her seat when she finished.In the past two years, the liberal Democrats have proven that they either have no knowledge of the contents of this distinguished document that was the base for their swearing in ceremony when each of them first became Congressmen or they have no loyalty to adhere to its rulings and guidance. Frankly, we all know it is the latter of those two as is shown by the largely antiAmerican legislation that favors not the people of the United States but only certain designated and chosen sections that are partial to those same liberal Democrats.Limbaugh wrote of two emWashington Postem bloggerwriters, Ezra Klein and E. J. Dionne providing input for the discussion on the constitutional reading, Klein calling it a gimmick and saying it was written more than 100 years ago showing a bit of uncertainty himself about the document that was signed and adopted in 1787 some 224 years ago.Dionne expressed similar irreverence for our founding document Limbaugh stated, by lamenting that the tea party movement has treated the Constitution as the equivalent of sacred scripture.Limbaugh went on to say that those assessments are quite a far cry from that of former a hrefhttpcanadafreepress.comindex.phparticle32054 targetblankBritish Prime Ministera William Gladstone, who observed, The American Constitution is, so far as I can see, the most wonderful work ever struck off at a given time by the brain and purpose of man.This is why Ezra Klein and E. J. Dionne emWashington Postem writers try to denigrate the Constitution to any extent possible because it is so RIGHT and I dont mean that in the political sense as compared to their LEFTness. No, those two followers of sociocommunist beliefs just dont like the fairness and correctness of our Constitution they would rather see it an even more jumbled mess than they normally describe it, if only to make their point that it is a faulty document.If ever they could get their heads screwed on properly they might be able to see the plausibility of that wonderful document that has been held up as a model of completeness by noted scholars and statesmen from around the globe.The left would like to be able to interpret it on an occasionbyoccasion basis and mold it to say what they would have it say had they themselves written it. In other words, let it state what is in their bigoted and warped brains for any given situation not a case of one rule fits all, but a case of one rule means to be changed to whatever they have in mind for that occasion. Typically leftwing cheating to make something fit that otherwise would never be acceptable. Like the liberal interpretation of the word a hrefhttpcanadafreepress.comindex.phparticle32054 targetblankbipartisanshipa to mean, Do it our way.