caption id alignalignleft width111 caption Border agents will have
to use oldfashion police techniques to secure the US, while the
government spends money to protect borders in other nations. Photo
CBPimg
srchttpcdn2b.examiner.comsitesdefaultfilesstyleslargehash043dborder20patrol.jpg
alt width111 height120 captionFriday is traditionally the day on
which bad news or politically harmful information is released by
denizens of the nations capital, and January 14 is no different
Secretary of Homeland Security JanetNapolitanos office announced
that the Obama administrationcanceledthe Virtual Fence project
along the U.S.Mexico border.The reason for this latest cancellation
is the continued technical equipmentproblemsand the rising costs of
constructing and installing the components including closedcircuit
TV cameras and monitors,electronic detectors, and other security
measures.As reported by the Law Enforcement Examiner, the original
border security plan called for a fence and barriers tobe usedon
parts of the U.S.s southern border, but with the Democrats
controlling both houses of Congress and the Bush Administration
being weak on border security, the plan switched from a real fence
to a virtual fence using hightech equipment.Unfortunately, the
Department of Homeland Securitys latest failure to protect the
United State,was acostly program to place crucial electronic
surveillance systems along the U.S.Mexico border thatis years
behind schedule.The security projectisgrossly over budget
becauseSecretary Janet Napolitanosagency hasnt adequately managed
the contractor doing the work, according to a Washington, DC
watchdog group.As a result, hundreds of millions of taxpayer
dollars will be wasted and the porous southern border will continue
to be vulnerable despite the Obama Administrations assurances that
its as secure as its ever been. So far the troubled project, known
as Secure Border Initiative Network, has cost the government 672
million although its nowhere near completion, according toJudicial
Watch, a publicinterest group that investigates political
corruption.After years of debates, congressional votes, government
studies and political posturing by lawmakers, the socalled virtual
fence continues to cause more problems than it solves, according to
testimony at a session of the House Homeland Security Committee.In
a compromise that met with disappointment by those who advocate
tighter border security, instead of walls or chain link fencing,
the U.S. Border Patrol and Homeland Security Department created the
concept of virtual fence security that includes surveillance
cameras, motion or heat sensing detectors, radar, and supposed
stateoftheart control towers designed to detect and prevent illegal
immigration and drug smuggling into the United States.According to
a report obtained by the National Association of Chiefs of Police,
the security contractor Boeing Co. is installing the hitech
physical security system. The original plan called for a completion
date by December 2009 at a cost of 1.1 billion for avirtual fence.
According to the report obtained by NACOP, Boeing requested that
completion date to be amended by seven years.Physical security
experts told this writer it should surprise no one that a
relatively simple project would become complicated and unmanageable
given that fact that most of the decisionmakers probably have no
law enforcement, security or engineering background.The
Obamainitiative aims to enhance border security by designing
technological tools that enable Border Patrol agents to detect and
respond to incursions along unmanned stretches of the 2,000mile
Mexican border. This includes installing unattended ground sensors,
radars and cameras. The socalled virtual fence was supposed to be
completed by 2011, but Homeland Security officials recently pushed
the date up to 2014, well after Obamas 2012 reelection
campaign.Thats because the agency has failed to properly oversee
the projects prime contractor, resulting in costly rework, numerous
delays and lots of extra money. In fact Homeland Security officials
stood by as the contractor provided information that was replete
with unexplained anomalies, thus rendering the data unfit for
effective contractor management and oversight, congressional
investigators found.The initiative to erect barriers both
electronic and physical along the U.S. Mexico border has been
plagued with a multitude of problems since it was implemented under
the George W. Bush Administration. After funding issues got largely
settled, some border mayors in Texas blocked the feds from
conducting fence work on city property, a large Indian tribe Tohono
Oodham in Arizona refused to allow a fence to be erected along a
vulnerable stretch of border and the socalled virtual fence project
has been delayed several times.Last year a separate GAO report
revealed that the physical fencewas costing U.S. taxpayers an
average of nearly 4 million per mile. The per mile costs vary
considerably depending on the type of fencing, topography,
materials, labor costs and the price of land acquisition, but
investigators determined that serious cost overruns have led to the
exorbitant average figure.
Date Published: