img classalignright
srchttpwww.britannica.comblogswpcontentuploads200912climategate.jpg
alt width300 height270 Being that the liberal animal must exist
within a heightened state of hysteria, todays headline from Yahoo
News seems a bit understated, even by the lefts silly standards..
Global Warming Dire Prediction for the Year 3000.. 01142011 You
have to admire the tenacity of the liberals, then again relative to
the globaloney warming fiction and fables, you would have to admire
their tenASSity..Never ones to give up on a good fairy tale, even
after almost every one of the so called scientists who daringly
dangled their weenies within this collectivist campfire has since
been singled by the dancing embers of fact, they still trot the
same nonsense out which is based upon nothingness to their more
than willing audience.. The easy way around this most recent detour
of details is to take your science and just claim that the results
of your study wont effect the world for another thousand years or
so..Here are a group of scientists who cannot tell you with any
accuracy what the weather will be like tomorrow but since they have
again held another sance with their Al Gore Magic Ouija boards,
they now know to a certainty what the weather will be like in
another thousand years or so.. The accompanying pie charts and bar
graphs may be pretty for the liberals to drool over but since their
scientists have been caught fudging their facts, since they were
caught asking others within their progressive pantheon to overlook
their lack of facts and since they havent the courage to admit that
they are professional liars for profit, its nothing more than
liberal lunacy..Even if humans stop producing excess carbon dioxide
in 2100, the lingering effects of global warming could span the
next millennia. By the year 3000, global warming could be more than
a hot topic.. Using the same scientific kinds of research as the
liberals, I will predict that in the year 4976, give or take
another thousand years, everything will be adjusting from another
Ice Age.. Note the liberal disdain, even if humans.. Never mind
that every volcanic eruption, every hot spring and geyser sends CO2
everywhere.. Maybe the Democratic Deity should stop polluting the
precious environment with the all of the flights needed for all of
his weekly vacations..Using a computer model, researchers looked at
two scenarios.. Who programmed this computer model If the
programmer had say, an agenda, and he or she programmed the
software to respond in a particular way, no one in their right mind
call the results valid or even scientific. Regardless of this
logic, the liberals would do so because there is a profit to be
made as long as they can avoid the inconvenient truths..Two
scenarios Even if the researchers looked at a thousand scenarios,
if they were based upon the typically bogus computer model that
nearly every globaloneyist utilizes, it means absolutely nothing.
Besides, if the results dont jibe with the preconceived notions
that surround globaloney warming, they will all just cover things
up.. Especially if these results didnt enhance the lefts personal
monetary investments in all of the alternative fuel flotsam..Even
if humans were to stop emitting excess carbon dioxide the effects
of global warming would continue to accumulate.. Alright then, it
sounds as if it is too late to save the planet, so get off of our
backs.. Even if humans stop emitting excess carbon dioxide EVERY
plant on the planet would continue to do so as will everything that
utilizes plants for sustenance.. Carbon dioxide is a trace gas
which comprises 0.039 of the atmosphere.. Liberal delirium and
frenzy will have you believe that that figure is closer to 99 and
that is based upon their research, which is known to the rest of us
as hysterical hunches..Thats because previously emitted carbon
dioxide lingers in the atmosphere.. It lingers.. How convenient. So
carbon dioxide is the equivalent of what the bus smells like an
hour after the last liberal gets off at the Methadone clinic..
Since it has been lingering for centuries, the source HAS to be
HUMAN.. Why wont the left ever talk about how long their deficits
and unemployment will be lingering Ill wager that the carbon
dioxide problem goes away sooner than the problems created by the
liberals..The study focused on carbon dioxide because it is the
principal greenhouse gas and it can linger in the atmosphere for
centuries.. Alright, lets run with this..The largest source of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has to be the burning of coal.
Coal is the largest source of energy for the generation of
electricity worldwide.. Wikipedia If the liberals REALLY wanted to
lower the lingering effects of carbon dioxide they would stand
firmly behind the actual science of nuclear power. Even if the
liberals managed to have everyone ride their bicycles, the effects
of all of that huffing and puffing would be an increase in human
carbon dioxide..The model showed these waters would warm very
little by 2100 but by 3000 theyd likely increase by 5.4 degrees
Fahrenheit in parts.. Please make note of the most crucial word in
all of that piffle, likely. Not definitely, just likely. If it
turns out otherwise well, the sun was in the researchers eyes or
the dog ate the scientists homework.. They meant well as all
liberals do, so their little errors of enthusiasm are to be
dismissed without consequences or giggles..This study spoke of
intensified winds as well, winds that can only be matched by the
wind created by these scientists and researchers who are doing
nothing more than singing for their supper. With all of these
government grants and all of the research funding floating about,
the only thing that seems to matter is results. Not VERIFIED
results, just results and they had better be scary.. When your
results are sufficiently frightening, you will need more funding in
order to do more research..Even when they are found to have the
steeple sticking from their backsides it doesnt matter as the
gravity of the epidemic that they are studying is more important
than a few miscues by almost EVERY researcher or scientist
connected to this con job..Just to cover themselves or just to
confuse any reader, they claim that the changes, some of them will
reverse partially or the Arctic Sea ice has recovered from its
losses by 3000 or these waters would warm very little by 2100..
This is nothing more than scientific spitballing and the fact that
it is underwritten by colleges, universities and most disgustingly,
the taxpayers makes it the REAL epidemic surrounding this Marxist
moonshine..It would be really important to see this in some climate
models to see if they find the same result, because every model has
its own set of uncertainties.. The whole of the science surrounding
globaloney warming is nothing but uncertainties.. They even took
the risk of claiming that the drying predicted for North Africa
could continue even after emissions are stopped in 2100.. There is
drying in North Africa Where is the Sahara Desert It is actually
ALL of North Africa, its 3,630,000 square miles covers almost the
entirety of this region already and has since well before the evil
humans and their automobiles took to joyriding in the United
States.. Drying in North Africa.. Wow, what a scientific discovery,
send that man a check or three..After all of this silly socalled
science with its daring predictions of African drying and melting
ice, the dark tone takes a darker turn as all of this science will
have some far reaching results. Since almost all of the imbecile
science surrounding globaloney warming, climate change or any other
progressive pontificating for profit has been publicly disproved,
all that we have here is some more far reaching passed off as
results..
Date Published: