Summary: Two Disturbing Lessons From Chaos in Cairo
The ongoing turbulence in Egypt transmits two profound and disturbing lessons to American policy makers and all those who care about international affairs.
1) No Amount of Foreign Aid can redeem a deeply dysfunctional society. Since 1979, Egypt has been one of the top recipients of American assistance, with taxpayers investing more than $70 billion (adjusted for inflation). The angry demonstrations against the Mubarak regime show that no amount of aid can guarantee stability, prosperity, democratic institutions or even a reliably pro-American foreign policy. At the United Nations, Egypt has voted against the United States some 70% of the time, resembling Venezuela and Iran more than American allies like the United Kingdom and Israel. While the Mubarak government has provided important support for American aims in the War on Terror, the vast quantities of American aid combine with the shaky status of the current government to show that no amount of U.S. generosity can purchase reliable friends or insure that struggling nations will develop benign and durable institutions. American aid seems to work only with nations that are headed in the right direction in the first place. Overall, Senator Rand Paul is right about the need for major cuts in the overall budget of international assistance: foreign aid (even to our noble ally, Israel) constitutes a questionable investment at a time of budgetary crisis. Some thoughtful Israelis have reached the same conclusion, by the way, and will back a reduction in assistance to the Jewish state if the administration simultaneously eliminates money to Israel’s Arab neighbors (most notably including the Egyptians).
Read more on Two Disturbing Lessons From Chaos in Cairo…
img classalignleft
srchttpmedia.townhall.comTownhallReub20115C325C20110201T154016Z01HPB51RTRIDSP0AUSTRIA.jpg
alt width225 height150 The ongoing turbulence in Egypt transmits
two profound and disturbing lessons to American policy makers and
all those who care about international affairs.1 strongNo Amount of
Foreign Aid can redeem a deeply dysfunctional society.strong Since
1979, Egypt has been one of the top recipients of American
assistance, with taxpayers investing more than 70 billion adjusted
for inflation. The angry demonstrations against the Mubarak regime
show that no amount of aid can guarantee stability, prosperity,
democratic institutions or even a reliably proAmerican foreign
policy. At the United Nations, Egypt has voted against the United
States some 70 of the time, resembling Venezuela and Iran more than
American allies like the United Kingdom and Israel. While the
Mubarak government has provided important support for American aims
in the War on Terror, the vast quantities of American aid combine
with the shaky status of the current government to show that no
amount of U.S. generosity can purchase reliable friends or insure
that struggling nations will develop benign and durable
institutions. American aid seems to work only with nations that are
headed in the right direction in the first place. Overall, Senator
Rand Paul is right about the need for major cuts in the overall
budget of international assistance foreign aid even to our noble
ally, Israel constitutes a questionable investment at a time of
budgetary crisis. Some thoughtful Israelis have reached the same
conclusion, by the way, and will back a reduction in assistance to
the Jewish state if the administration simultaneously eliminates
money to Israels Arab neighbors most notably including the
Egyptians.2 strongThe chaos in Cairo shows the limited value of
agreements with corrupt, autocratic governments.strong If the
Mubarak regime collapses, promises to America and the crucial peace
treaty with Israel may survive or they may not. Alliances and
treaties mean very little when they depend upon the whim of one
man, or the fleeting inclinations of an arrogant ruling circle that
operates independent of public opinion. Prior to 1979, the Shah of
Iran qualified as Americas best friend in the Middle East but when
his rule collapsed in the midst of angry demonstrations and clumsy
policy pronouncements by the Jimmy Carter administration, the
nation went from U.S. ally to implacable enemy within months.
Agreements and understandings with democratically elected
governments can bring durable and significant gains, but deals with
dictators dont often outlast the dictator. This principle
demonstrates the limited utility of signed pieces of paper think
Hitler and Munich with authoritarian regimes. Despite the
unmistakable benefits for Israel from the threedecadeslong peace
treaty with Egypt, Israeli leaders have always understood military
strength remains the only real guarantee of selfdefense, not
promises from shaky regimes like Egypt or the beleaguered
Palestinian Authority.Embracing the messages from the Egyptian
crisis doesnt mean that Hosni Mubarak deserves our contempt, or
that the United States would somehow gain from suddenly and
cravenly cutting loose our most important Arab ally. To the extent
that U.S. aid purchased longstanding cooperation from the most
populous nation in the region one third of all the worlds Arabs
live in Egypt, that assistance may have constituted a prudent
investment, and regardless of the future of the Sinai Accords, the
epochal agreement negotiated by Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin
brought thirty years of relative if frosty calm to IsraeliEgyptian
relations.Nevertheless, the current turmoil demonstrates that the
benefits of big aid budgets and muchheralded international treaties
may prove ephemeral and limited. Those who believe that permanent
or even longterm benefits can result from bribes or negotiations
with shady, authoritarian regimes will repeat the same
miscalculations that have too frequently warped American policy in
the past.
Date Published: