2010 will likely be remembered in the coming decades as the year
when Americans turned back from the brink and reasserted their
devotion to the traditional values and principles that have
produced the most powerful, most prosperous, and until recently,
the freest nation on earth. The elections of last November were a
thunderous refutation of the arrogant elitists in Washington and an
irrefutable declaration from the people of the heartland that they
are not ready to relinquish their national inheritance to the
counterculture and the political left.Earlier last year, several
stunning primary upsets, epitomized by the ouster of Senator Bob
Bennett, a Utah Republican moderate, set the stage for the
conservative ascendancy that is beginning to register shockwaves
among the business as usual members of both major parties.
Unfortunately, in the midst of such triumph, a disturbing
confluence of circumstances in Wyoming curtailed the possibility
that the waves of national restoration might be likewise enjoyed in
the Cowboy State.Benefiting from a fourway Republican gubernatorial
primary race that was fairly evenly split, candidate Matt Mead was
able to garner significant support from liberal Democrat crossover
voters who took advantage of a major deficiency in Wyoming election
law allowing them to change party affiliation on Election Day.
Reports of entire state offices in Cheyenne, the capital, engaging
in such behavior were rampant, as well as exasperated statements
from election judges who had to contend with the massive volume of
resulting paperwork, while being forced to watch helplessly as the
electoral process was hideously perverted.As a result, Mead won the
split primary, with barely twenty seven percent of the vote, and
went on to claim Wyomings governorship on November 2. And despite
offering the standard conservative and traditional GOP platitudes
to which Republican moderates typically resort in the closing days
of the election cycle, in barely three months since his win he has
in many ways already validated the worst fears of his conservative
critics.It is virtually impossible to refute the evidence that his
predecessor, Democrat Governor Dave Freudenthal, was instrumental
in securing Meads election. Freudenthal, a skilled political
operative, has mastered the art of speaking on the right while
governing to the left. On more than one occasion, he has loudly
criticized the liberal excesses of his own party, even refusing to
attend the 2004 Democrat National Convention in which Massachusetts
Senator John Kerry was nominated to run against then President
George W. Bush.Yet Freudenthals charade was not entirely airtight.
Clearly, it was a safe bet that the hapless Kerry was no major
threat to the incumbent Bush. In those predictable circumstances,
Freudenthal had little to lose by failing to sufficiently sanction
his partys candidate. In 2008 however, he recognized the energy of
Barack Obamas drive for the White House, and was quick to get on
that bandwagon, thoroughly dispelling any doubts as to his true
liberal loyalties.So Wyoming voters had ample evidence to alert
them of what mischief was afoot when Freudenthal refused to promote
Democrat Gubernatorial candidate Leslie Peterson, thus backing Mead
by default. The legacy of the Wyoming political insiders club would
necessitate that Freudenthals liberalism and governmentbloating
ambitions be maintained. And Mead was just the man to do it.True to
form, among Meads first acts as Governorelect was to appoint
Democrat Greg Phillips, a former twoterm State Senator, as Wyoming
Attorney General, a move which did not portend well for those who
hoped to join the antiObamacare lawsuits sweeping the nation. Yet
more was shortly to come.From the early days of the 2011 Wyoming
State Legislature, Mead began sending signals that the conservatism
of his campaign was merely cosmetic and soon to be jettisoned. Now
secure in the Governors office, he is clearly angling towards the
middle, by waffling and backtracking from conservative positions
which he felt compelled to take in front of the cameras in 2010.It
is hardly imaginable that a true Republican would have any problem
denouncing Obamacare, either from a political or a moral
standpoint. Yet Mead was a definite latecomer to the notion that
Wyoming ought to resist the imposition of medical socialism. His
belated participation in the effort was halfhearted at
best.Likewise, in regards to grassroots efforts to protect the
institution of traditional marriage, his duplicity has rivaled
anything from those doublespeaking Beltway insiders. This years
legislative session has witnessed a bold grassroots effort to
institute a constitutional amendment that would preserve the
timehonored definition of marriage in Wyoming as it has been upheld
in virtually every other state. Facing the prospect of having to
sign or veto the measure, Mead is now desperately looking for
wiggle room.In a January 28 news conference, he asserted a personal
belief that marriage should be between one man and one woman. This
he immediately followed with an admonition to be very careful and
pragmatic about how we approach this, followed by a caveat
suggesting that neglecting to sufficiently straddle the fence might
somehow limit access to our court system, presumably by samesex
couples.Across the nation, 2011 proved to be the year in which
principled and unapologetic devotion to the American ideal swept
the political landscape. And among the citizens of Wyoming, this
was no less the case. Yet it is clear that just as Heartland
America must confront the ruling class inside the Beltway,
Wyomingites will need to project their concerns and convictions
forward and upward into their states political system. Truly
courageous and conservative office holders will need vigorous
grassroots support, while imposters must be shown the door.Unless
the citizens of Wyoming loudly rise up and voice their concerns,
demand accountability from those in office, and exact a political
price from any who would remain indifferent to them, they will see
all of their sweat and toil of the last two years diluted and
eventually neutralized.
Date Published: