Those who exploit global climate change for their own personal and
political reasons rely on the general ignorance of the public when
it comes to science and the scientific method.strongemThe bible has
it right emstrongblockquoteemGenesisem 822 While the earth
remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and
winter, and day and night shall not cease.emEcclesiastes em14 One
generation passeth away, and another generation cometh but the
earth abideth for ever.blockquoteAnd so the natural order of things
appears to be both cyclical and beyond mans current ability to
drastically alter nature on a global scale.emstrongWhat they are
not saying strongemstrong1.strong It appears that the main purpose
of those who are promoting the issue of global climate change are
doing so in order to promote a political agenda or to pursue a
personal agenda of fame and fortune.strong2.strong All of the dire
predictions are based on computer models which were created and
operated by scientists whose organizations are either controlled
directly by the government or who have significant government
funding.strong3.strong Without the appearance of catastrophic
outcomes, media attention would fade and the public could not be
manipulated into accepting draconian political policies which
promote socialism, enlarge the sphere of government, raise taxes
and limit personal freedoms.strong4.strong Many of the models do
not correlate well with historic projects and, upon closer
inspection, appear to have been created with dodgy assumptions,
suspect programming and highly manipulated data.strong5.strong The
public has been sold on the idea that peer review somehow implies
acceptance by the broader scientific community, when in fact, peer
review is a scientific journal publishing process that assures that
the published works meets the journals standards for basic
credibility and clarity. Reviewers do not replicate or test
hypotheses, nor do they closely examine the underlying data. They
simply reject kooky ideas. dot the Is and cross the Ts while making
sure that the article is clear, logically presented and devoid of
obvious flaws.strong6.strong The climate change alarmists have
promoted the idea that climate change skeptics are outoftouch or
have evil capitalist intents. What the public most often fails to
realize is that the scientific method demands skepticism and the
replication of results. And that a single researcher, working in
their home, is as likely to produce a scientific breakthrough as
wellcredentialed scientists working for prestigious institutions.
In fact, some amateur climatologists have made very significant
contributions to the science of global climate change by pointing
our physical and mathematical inconsistencies in the research of
others.
Date Published: