
Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)If you're looking for an intelligent satirical
romantic comedy that's a little outrageous and lots of fun, you've
found it! But first a warning: I directed this film, so obviously
there's a bias, though I am usually pretty hard on my own work. It
was in the 2000 Sundance Film Festival and did very well there.
Audiences loved it. I think you will, too. I gave it 5 stars
(though I haven't seen the DVD yet) for the above reason(me being
the director), but I must confess that the sound quality isn't the
greatest. Chalk that up to low budget independent filmmaking. Other
than that, the film looks great and is a huge amount of fun to
watch. You'll probably need to watch it a few times to get all the
jokes and double entendres (and there are a lot of them), and I
guarantee you'll catch something new each time.
The film gives you a behind the scenes look at the fashion industry
but it's certainly not meant to be a serious expose, although I
tried hard (and succeeded) to keep it honest and authentic. The
writers, who were both in the Fashion Magazine business as interns,
were on the set every day making sure we kept it all true to form.
Many of the scenes in the film and even some of the dialogue
actually happened to the writers. And most of the characters are
based on real people in the business.
Dominique Swain is sublime in the role of Jocelyn. She's likeable,
beautiful and vulnerable yet strong. Ben Pullen is charming. Sort
of a more accessible version of Hugh Grant. Joan Rivers is very
funny and fun to watch. Kathy Griffin is hilarious, Peggy Lipton is
also very funny and Paulina Porizkova is beautiful and not afraid
to look a little silly. Anna Thompson is fantastic as Antoinette, a
totally bizarre hair editor. David Deblinger, who is somehow
missing from the credits in Amazon (he is credited in the film, of
course), plays Richard, who turns out to be Jocelyn's best friend
at Skirt. He came in to audition for a smaller part, but asked if
he could read for Richard. I said OK and he nailed it. He really
brought alot to the party. All of the rest of the cast is terrific.
Lots of strong New York actors. There are lots of fashion cameos-
Tommy Hilfiger, Gwyneth Paltrow, Kenneth Cole, Andre Leon Talley,
etc.
The story is basically a romantic comedy about Jocelyn (Dominique)
who is an intern at Skirt Magazine and her experiences at the mag.
She falls in love with Paul (Ben) but he's involved with Resin
(Leilani Bishop), a Supermodel with all the expected attributes.
Does she get the guy? You'll have to watch to find out. Along the
way, she's treated pretty poorly by most of the people she works
for. I'm sure any of you who have been interns in your life will
totally identify with this.
There's also a corporate espionage B-story about layouts for the
magazine being sent ahead of time to Vogue.....Who's the spy?
I wanted to put a comedic commentary on the DVD, but there wasn't
quite enough time to pull it off. Sorry about that. I'm told that
there is some footage that was taken from the various events at the
Sundance Festival-- interviews and stuff like that. I'll make sure
to put the commentary on the re-release.....
Anyway, I had a great time making this film and I know that you'll
have a great time watching it. It's not for kids (quite a bit of
swearing and some gay characters- though my kids love it), but it's
fun for anyone else. If you'd like to contact me about the film
I've set up a special e-mail address. It's MIKESINTERN@AOL.COM.
Please feel free to get in touch. I'm anxious to know what you
think of my film.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
The Intern (1999)
Buy cheap The Intern (1999) now.
Date Published: Jan 02, 2012 - 8:30 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)In "Second Chances," the consequences of a
long-ago accident resurface to give Commander Riker a glimpse of
the road not taken, in his life. In the process, we get a more
thoughtful look at one of Star Trek's most basic premises.
A few key science fiction concepts have always been Star Trek
staples: phaser weapons, warp drive, transporters. However,
surprisingly few Trek stories have dealt directly with the issue of
how such technologies might "warp" basic facts of human life.
"Second Chances" really does so, imagining the unsettling results
of a transporter malfunction. As anyone who's ever watched the show
knows, "transporters" enable matter to be instantaneously
"de-materialized" at one location & "re-materialized" at
another--literally recording the (molecular?) "pattern" of an
object & faithfully reproducing it at second site. As difficult
& dangerous as this sounds, the Trek universe presupposes that
ordinary people routinely (& safely!) travel this way, 300-400
years from now.
Earlier stories have dealt with some obvious risks of this
technology: for example, travellers killed as their "patterns" were
lost or scrambled in transit. They have also dealt with improbable
outcomes: a man split into "good" & "evil" twins, for example.
Here, something more intriguing happens:
Years before the episode, a malfunctioning transporter had
re-materialized Will Riker *both* at his intended destination &
at his point of departure, in effect creating 2 absolutely
identical men out of 1 original. One is left stranded & alone
in an abandoned base on a remote planet. The other has a brilliant
career, leading to his assignment to the Enterprise. Originally the
same man, they have lived lives as different as Robinson Crusoe
& Horatio Hornblower. Despite these different experiences,
neither can be said to be the "true," "original," or "real" Will
Riker. So that when the castaway Will Riker is rescued, both men
must come to grips with the their different lives--as well as their
feelings for the same woman: Riker's longtime love & best
friend, Deanna Troi.
The story of the "castaway" Riker later resumes in the pivotal DS9
episode, "The Defiant," in which TNG & DS9 storylines involving
the Maquis, the Cardassians, & the Dominion also come to an
important crossroads.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Star Trek - The Next
Generation, Episode 150: Second Chances (1987)
Get
46% OFF
Buy cheap Star Trek - The Next Generation, Episode 150: Second
Chances (1987) now.
Date Published: Jan 01, 2012 - 4:37 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)Presented by the National Endowment for the
Arts, this is a short documentary (21 minutes) with a lot of
additional commentary bonus material.
The documentary is comprised of clips of famous actors, directors
and writers who speak of their experience with acting in
Shakespeare productions in their school years and how it affected
them in a positive way. Also interviewed are students who are
acting in Shakespeare productions in schools. We hear of how acting
in live stage productions (not just reading Shakespeare in
classrooms) has positively affected the lives of inner city
minority students. We hear that it was Shakespeare who saved some
from joining gangs or dropping out of high school.
Another clear message is that Shakespeare's words are poetry and
although they are not in the modern English we use today, his
words, the characters and their struggles are still relevant to
modern American culture.
The importance of experiencing live acted Shakespeare plays and the
benefit of students acting in stage productions is a clear message
in this documentary. Rafe Esquith's Hobart Shakespearians program
for English as a Second Language students is mentioned briefly.
Sprinkled throughout we hear the actors reciting their favorite
lines or telling who their favorite character is, and why.
The bonus material contains a bio and additional commentary from
the people. On that menu page for each person are bullet points
stating the main points of what they say in the bonus material
(making it easy to find statements to match what you want the
viewers to see).
It is obvious that the purpose of this documentary is to convince
viewers, probably school systems and teachers, to create or
continue to offer programs for school students to act in live stage
productions of Shakespeare plays. The documentary seems ideally
suited to show to audiences that need convincing of this fact,
whether they are school administrators, Boards of Education or
Boards of Finance, or private investors who may donate money to
productions for children to participate with (such as the Hobart
Shakespeareans that takes donor money).
This documentary was well done and it was convincing. In just
twenty minutes a powerful message is delivered. After watching it,
I felt that in an ideal world every child would have an opportunity
to act in a Shakespeare production and that all who ever have a
chance will be affected in different ways, but definitely in a
positive way.
What This Documentary is NOT
This movie is not an in-depth exploration of Shakespeare's work.
This does not teach a school teacher why or how to teach
Shakespeare as literature in a classroom. This does not teach a
drama teacher how to run a live stage production of Shakespeare's
plays. This is not an analysis of Shakespeare's plays. This is not
Shakespeare 101. If you are looking for any of those things, you
will be disappointed. I pointed out the strengths of the production
and my hunch on why the production was made, for those purposes and
those audiences this is an effective and useful twenty minute
tool.
It is unfair to judge a documentary for not being what someone
wishes it was. There is hardly any marketing material on the
packaging and no promises are made that are not delivered.
NOTE: A second title is used on the packaging and on the
documentary itself "Shakespeare in American Communities". That is
the title of a national initiative of the National Endowment for
the Arts. You can read more about it on their website.
NOTE: My edition is clearly marked "Not For Resale" and it does not
have a retail price on it. According to the National Endowment for
the Arts this item was released only to educators free of
charge.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Why Shakespeare : National
Endowment for the Arts
DVD
Buy cheap Why Shakespeare : National Endowment for the
Arts now.
Date Published: Dec 30, 2011 - 7:53 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)The biting and caustic wit of Mrs Parker is
bought superbly to life by the versatile actress Jennifer Jason
Leigh who plays the brittle writer, critic and sometimes playwright
to vulnerable perfection.
This is not an easy film to watch and I can understand why some
people found it hard to get into. I mean the 1920s were supposedly
a time of fun, jazz, speak easy booze and laughter all around, the
Great War was over and life was back to normal.
However watching the desperation of Mrs Parker's generation, the
bright young things drink themselves silly, take drugs and lash out
at each other in a perpetual game of verbal cat-o-nine-tails makes
you realise that perhaps everything was not as "normal" as most
people hoped.
The film jumps back and forth through Mrs Parker's life, some of
the best scenes are in black and white, and we are treated to
subtle barbs, cruel wit and tasty treats in the guise of a
crackingly good cast, with Mathew Broderick doing himself proud as
the sweet talking but brutal rouge who abandons his pregnant lover
(Mrs Parker), Andrew McCarthy as Mrs Parker's husband Eddie, fresh
from war and addicted to morphine.
All in all this is a deliciously complex film that will you need to
see more than once, well worth an evening in with a box of pop-corn
and a friend to share the sarcasm, and the very satirical humour
that runs through the film from beginning to end.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Mrs. Parker and the Vicious
Circle (1994)
Buy cheap Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle (1994)
now.
Date Published: Dec 29, 2011 - 4:11 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)The novel by Joe McGinness kept me up all night,
and the miniseries kept me just as involved. A North Carolina woman
is attacked in her sleep and her second husband is fatally wounded
by an unknown assailant. She recovers and is released from the
hospital, but her nineteen year old son is acting awfully strange.
Gripping and intense, and sure to put a lump in your throat.
Another book about this case is "Blood Games" by Jerry Bledsoe.
Look for a young David Arquette, and real life mother and daughter
Blythe Danner and Gwyneth Paltrow play mother and daughter
here.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Cruel Doubt (1992)
Buy cheap Cruel Doubt (1992) now.
Date Published: Dec 27, 2011 - 10:46 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)Kate Hudson plays Andie Anderson a columnist for
Composure magazine. Even though she has a degree from Columbia, she
is stuck writing a "How To" fluff piece for the magazine. Her
latest assignment is to pick a guy, and do all the stupid things
girls do to chase a man away. "How To Lose A Guy In 10 Days" is
Andie's next challenge to write. Ben is the perfect man for her
column!
Matthew McConaughey plays Benjamin Barry an ad executive wanting to
break into a market he has never represented before. To market
diamonds, his boss believes you have to understand what true love
is, so Ben has to make a woman chosen for him, fall in love with
him. Of course, Andie is the women Ben has to woo.
Kate and Matthew have so much chemistry on screen that they sizzle.
This is such a fun movie. There are many funny moments, and some
touching serious ones. You will want to see it over and over
again.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days
(2003)
Buy cheap How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days (2003) now.
Date Published: Dec 26, 2011 - 3:28 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)I've been looking for this title on video/DVD
for more than a decade, and was very surprised to suddenly see it
listed here at Amazon. Unfortunately, upon placing the disc in my
player, my anticipation turned to extreme disappointment.
This "digitally remastered" DVD looks like it was transferred to
the medium from a really old, faded and probably moldy VHS tape.
The image is blurry, and the colors are washed out. The sound is
quite tinny, as well.
Under no circumstances should you consider buying this title. It's
practically unwatchable, and would be a waste of money.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
The Bell Jar (1979)
This stirring drama is based on the internationally best-selling
autobiography by renowned poet Sylvia Plath.It is the story of a
gifted young poet, Esther Greenwood, whose inner genius has trapped
her in a private world of terror.Like author Plath, a
Get
10% OFF
Buy cheap The Bell Jar (1979) now.
Date Published: Dec 24, 2011 - 7:40 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)When Emma Thompson was approached with the
suggestion to write a screenplay based on Jane Austen's first novel
"Sense and Sensibility" (1811), she was somewhat doubtful because,
as she explains on the DVD's commentary track, she felt that other
Austen works, like the more expressive "Emma" and "Persuasion" or
the sardonic "Pride and Prejudice" (already the subject of several
adaptations) would have been more suitable. Four years and 14
screenplay drafts later (the first, a 300-page handwritten
dramatization of the novel's every scene), "Sense and Sensibility"
made its grand entrance into theaters worldwide and mesmerized
audiences and critics alike, resulting in an Oscar for Thompson's
screenplay and six further nominations (Best Picture, Leading
Actress - Thompson -, Supporting Actress - Kate Winslet -, Adapted
Screenplay, Cinematography, Score - for 20 minutes' worth of
composition - and Costume Design); and double honors as Best
Picture and for Thompson's screenplay at the Golden Globes.
More than simple romances, Jane Austen's novels are delicately
constructed pieces of social commentary, written from her rural
Hampshire's perspective. Mostly confined to life in her father's
parish, she was nevertheless well aware of early 19th century
England's society at large, and fiercely critical of the loss of
morals and decorum she saw in its pre-industrial emergent city
life. Moreover, experience and observation had made her acutely
aware of the corsets forced onto women in fashion terms as much as
by social norms, confining them to inactivity and complete
dependency on their families' and their (future) husbands' money.
And among this movie's greatest strengths is the manner in which it
maintains that underlying theme of Austen's writing and brings it
to a contemporary audience's attention. "You talk about feeling
idle and useless: imagine how that is compounded when one has no
hope and no choice of any occupation whatsoever," Elinor Dashwood
(Thompson) tells her almost-suitor Edward Ferrars, and when he
replies that "our circumstances are therefore precisely the same,"
she corrects him: "Except that you will inherit your fortune - we
cannot even earn ours."
Rescuing much from the first draft dramatization of Austen's novel
and amplifying where necessary, Emma Thompson and director Ang Lee
("who most unexplainably seems to understand me better than I
understand myself," Thompson said in her mock-Austen Golden Globe
speech) produced a movie scrupulously faithful to what is known
about Austen's world and at the same time incredibly modern, thus
emphasizing the novel's timeless quality. Paintings were consulted
for the movie's production design, and indeed, almost every camera
frame - both landscapes and interiors - has the feeling of a
picture by a period painter. Thompson cleverly uses poetry where
the novel does not contain dialogue; and again, she does so in a
manner entirely faithful to Austen's subtleties - most prominently
in the joint recital of Shakespeare's Sonnet 116 by Marianne
Dashwood (Kate Winslet) and John Willoughby (Greg Wise), where an
ever so slight inaccuracy in his rendition of a sonnet he claims to
love foreshadows his lacking sincerity.
"Sense and Sensibility" revolves around Elinor and Marianne
Dashwood, their quest for a suitable husband, and the sisters'
relationship with each other. Emma Thompson maintains that she did
not write the screenplay with herself as Elinor in mind and would
not have been accepted for that role but for the success of her
previous films ("Howards End," "The Remains of the Day"); yet, it
is hard to imagine who could have better played sensible Elinor:
"effectual, ... [possessing] a coolness of judgment, which
qualified her, though only nineteen [and thus considerably younger
than Thompson], to be the counselor of her mother." And real-life
19-year-old Kate Winslet embodies sensitive, artistic Marianne:
"eager in everything; [without] moderation ... generous, amiable,
interesting: ... everything but prudent." (As an older actress was
sought for that part, her agent presented her as 25.) An early
scene in which Marianne recites Hartley Coleridge's Sonnet VII ("Is
love a fancy or a feeling? No. It is immortal as immaculate truth")
symbolizes the sisters' relationship and their personalities, as
Marianne mocks Elinor's seemingly cool response to Edward's budding
affection. (Mostly taken from the novel, the scene is embellished
by the screenplay's sole inexactitude: Coleridge's sonnets were
only published 22 years later). Yet, when all her hope seems
shattered, Elinor, in a rare outburst of emotion, rebukes her
sister: "What do you know of my heart?" - only to comfort her again
when she sees that Marianne is equally distraught.
Hugh Grant and Alan Rickman similarly perfectly portray the
sisters' suitors Edward Ferrars and Colonel Brandon, both embodying
the qualities Austen considered essential: simplicity, sincerity
and a firm sense of morality. Willoughby, on the other hand, while
entering the story like the proverbial knight on a white horse who
rescues the injured Marianne, does not live up to the high
expectations he evokes; he causes Marianne to unacceptably abandon
decorum and, just as he misspoke in that line from Shakespeare's
sonnet, his love eventually "bends with the remover to remove."
Similarly, Lucy Steele (Imogen Stubbs), the near-stumbling block to
Elinor's happiness, ultimately proves driven by nothing but an
"unceasing attention to self-interest ... with no other sacrifice
than that of time and conscience" (Austen) and is, despite a
fortuitous marriage, as marginalized as the Dashwoods' greedy
sister-in-law Fanny (Harriet Walter). Conversely, the boisterous
Sir John Middleton and his garrulous mother-in-law, while annoying
in their insensitivity, are essentially goodnatured; and
marvelously portrayed in their flawed but warmhearted ways by
Robert Hardy and Elizabeth Spriggs.
"Sense and Sensibility" came out at the height of the mid-1990s'
Jane Austen revival. Of all movies released then, and alongside
1996's "Emma" (which has "Hollywood" written all over it) and the
BBC's "Pride and Prejudice" (which finally established Colin Firth
as the leading man in the U.S. that he had long been in Britain),
Emma Thompson's "Sense and Sensibility" is one of those adaptations
that future generations of moviegoers will likely turn to in years
to come. And it is truly an experience not to be missed.
Also recommended:
The Complete Novels of Jane Austen (Wordsworth Library
Collection)
Jane Austen Collection (Sense & Sensibility / Emma / Persuasion
/ Mansfield Park / Pride & Prejudice / Northanger Abbey)
Pride and Prejudice (10th Anniversary Collector's Set) (A&E,
1996)
Persuasion
Howards End - The Merchant Ivory Collection
Shakespeare's Sonnets (Folger Shakespeare Library)
Sonnets from the Portuguese: A Celebration 0f Love
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Sense and Sensibility
(1995)
Get
80% OFF
Buy cheap Sense and Sensibility (1995) now.
Date Published: Dec 23, 2011 - 2:40 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)Paul Thomas Anderson is, by his own admission, a
big fan of dvd/laserdisc commentary tracks, where, if you are
lucky, you'll hear the director, actors, writers and/or the
cinematographer of the movie you are watching talk about how it was
'all done'.
Hard Eight, or "Sydney" as it is better known to the people that
made it, is a superb example of what a DVD presentation has to
offer. There is the marvellous widescreen transfer - the movie
LOOKS great, then there are TWO commentary tracks, the first by
P.T.A. and star, Philip Baker Hall on 'Audio 2', and the other
track is a great combination (the first I've seen like this) where
the director interviews cast and crew members himself (on the set
during the production of Magnolia) - you get their thoughts and
comments cleverly sandwiched in-between the movie's music cues - so
you essentially get an isloated music track and second commentary
on the 'Audio 3' track. The isolated music track is, in places,
different to what actually appears in the film too.
On top of this there are deleted scenes from the movie and footage
from a Sundance Institute Filmakers Lab, which show scenes that
were shot as an experiment/example of what the real film
could/would be.
PT Anderson's commentary tracks are very enthusiastic, honest and
extremely informative. If you have any interest in filmaking this
is a really good one!
Oh, and it's a good film too.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Sydney (1997)
Buy cheap Sydney (1997) now.
Date Published: Dec 21, 2011 - 1:29 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)I actually passed on seeing "Sliding Doors"
several years ago because of a review I read by Roger Ebert. I knew
about the basic premise of the film, which is that a character
played by Gwyneth Paltrow gets on a subway train and does not get
on a subway train. The film goes back and forth between the two
plotlines, basically playing out both sides of Robert Frost's two
paths diverging in the woods. Ebert's complaint was that taken
independently neither of the plotlines was worth watching, which
was enough to convince me to see something else.
Well, now I have seen "Sliding Doors" and while I agree with
Ebert's critique, I want to argue that what is interesting about
this film is not the two plotlines but the way they interact. Think
of it as two wrongs making a right or the total effect being
greater than the sum of the two parts or whatever makes sense to
you. Writer-director Peter Howitt makes "Sliding Doors" into more
than just a gimmick film. It is not in the class of "Groundhog Day"
or "Memento," but it is certainly on a level with "50 First
Dates."
Paltrow plays Helen Quilley. One morning she goes off to work,
leaving behind her lover, Gerry (John Lynch). As soon as she gets
to work she is sacked. On the way home she both catches and misses
the subway in a sequences that is rather clumsily staged, but you
get the idea. The Helen on the subway gets home in time to catch
Gerry in bed with his supposedly ex-lover, Lydia (Jeanne
Tripplehorn). The Helen who misses the subway gets hurt when her
purse is stolen and gets home after Lydia has left and therefore
knows nothing about the affair.
Because of the near mugging Howitt is able to have one Helen look
different from the other because of a bandage on her head after the
hospital visit. By the time that heals the other Helen, trying to
put Gerry behind her, has shortened her hair and bleached in
blonde. The other key distinction is that while one Helen is still
with Gerry, working two jobs in order to support him while he (does
not) write a novel (and does continue to see Lydia), the other is
seeing James (John Hannah), a nice man she met on the subway home
and who believes the Monty Python line "Nobody expects the Spanish
Inquisition" helps to put life in perspective (which is certainly
true).
It seems fairly obvious that both Helens should be with James and
leave Gerry far behind, but it seems clear that Howitt is going to
work the irony angles as much as possible in this film. It is not
so much that these are parallel stories as their are recurring
elements of symmetry and at some point I decided that what was
going to happen here was that Howitt was going to be able to have
his cake and eat it two. This indeed turns out to be the case, but
telling you that does not give away the end game.
Paltrow is fine in the main role, although why the two main female
characters had to be played by American actresses is beyond me.
Tripplehorn's character is in the "Fatal Attraction" mold, which
makes Gerry's inability to choose between Helen and Lydia rather
laughable, a fact repeatedly pointed out to him by his friend,
Russell (Douglas McFerran) at the bar. Russell has the best lines
in the film, calling Gerry "a morality-free zone" and pointing out
that his advice will be unappreciated since it is based in reality.
Lynch manages to play Gerry so that there is some hope of
redemption and we remain open to the idea that things could work
out between him and Helen, while we wait for Helen to catch up with
our feelings for Hannah's character, who is likeable in a rather
surprisingly unpretentious way for such a gabby guy.
This is not a brilliant and creative film, but Howitt constructs
what I think is a smart story line bouncing back and forth between
the lives of the two Helens. There is no profound point to be made
in the end beyond the ancient idea that when it comes to the lives
of human beings and their attempts to find love in the world the
gods tend to look down and laugh. But in a world where so many
films are exercises in stupidity and I find myself thinking that
what ended up on screen was a first draft that needed some serious
work, "Sliding Doors" has all the pieces fit. The other film I have
seen by Howitt, "Antitrust," was also smartly crafted, although in
that one somebody else wrote the script. Still, that is not a bad
pair of films for viewers who like to have their brains
engaged.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Sliding Doors (1998)
Buy cheap Sliding Doors (1998) now.
Date Published: Dec 20, 2011 - 7:40 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)Kathy Griffin is the only celebrity (albeit a "D
List" celebrity) who doesn't seem to know about that little
unspoken rule that all celebrities are expected to live by. You
know what I'm talking about, right? There's this rule somewhere
when you sign that celebrity contract which states that you aren't
allowed to talk about the mean, stupid, rude, clueless, carpy
and/or tasteless things that other celebs do off-camera. Not only
has Kathy Griffin forgotten that taboo, she's made a career out of
breaking it - and yes Kathy, we do love you for it!
Allegedly is Griffin's latest installment in her ongoing mission to
expose the truth about the beautiful people who normally have
complete control over their carefully constructed public images.
OTOH here's Kathy: blunt, open and the opposite of all things
pretentious. She has that way about her that suggests that you're
meeting your best friend for lunch and a lot of dishing up on
gossip. Here is about one hour of taking down many sacred cows;
Gwyneth Paltrow, Barbara Walters, Eminem, Salma Hayek, and more.
She talks about her USO tour with other D lists and her VH1 Fashion
Award encounters. Her impersonations are spot-on funny. We learn
about behind sweat difficulties, which are surprisingly funny
coming from Kathy. A direct quote from my husband: "She's really
very base; I like her!"
Although I laughed often and well while watching Allegedly, I
couldn't give a full five star rating because it seemed that a few
things were off with Kathy on the night that this stand-up routine
was filmed. When I remembered her "D List" special from a few years
ago as shown on Comedy Central I couldn't help but compare how
relaxed and natural she seemed then compared to now; hurried, more
on edge and a little angrier. She seemed to be having less fun with
her material, and so did I. Nonetheless this is all great stuff and
I strongly recommend Allegedly for any fans of hers and for anybody
who's interested in a little glimpse into the goings-on of
backstage life in Hollywood.
-Andrea, aka Merribelle
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Kathy Griffin - Allegedly
(2004)
Bubbly, and yet sharply shrewd, comedian Kathy Griffin reflects on
some of her personal experiences in Hollyweird. The stand-up
comedian caught audiences' attention when she stole the show in
Brooke Shields's TV sitcom SUDDENLY SUSAN. Here Griffin shares
gossip on such celebrities as Gwyneth Paltrow, Renée Zellweger, and
Sandra Bullock. Her stories revolve around odd, bizarre, or
unpleasant encounters with superstars. For example, she reveals the
name of the picky celebrity who refused to join her onstage at an
awards show, and dishes about what really happened at Brooke
Shields's wedding. Then there was the time Kathy found herself
partying with Barbara Walters. This spitfire's take on celebrity
life is uproarious and, without a doubt, courageous.
Get
75% OFF
Buy cheap Kathy Griffin - Allegedly (2004) now.
Date Published: Dec 18, 2011 - 1:31 pm

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)The first disc features 11 deleted and extended
scenes. There's more of the opening ambush with Tony Stark being
more proactive. We also see more footage of Rhodes and it quickly
becomes apparent that he was the character with the most scenes cut
from the film. We also see Tony and Pepper Potts attend another
party.
The second disc starts off with the impressive "I Am Iron Man," a
108 minute making of documentary that can be viewed in seven
segments or altogether, taking us through various aspects of the
production. For example, we are taken step-by-step through the
construction of the Iron Man armor with Robert Downey Jr. cracking
jokes while being fitted for it. It's amazing how much of the suit
is practical and looks really good in person. This is due in large
part to the genius of the late-great Stan Winston and his company.
Also included is plenty of soundstage footage of scenes being
filmed.
"The Invincible Iron Man" is a six-part documentary on the comic
book, tracing the history of the character. Stan Lee says that he
modeled Stark after Howard Hughes, for the most part. He also
mentions that he was never fully satisfied with the look of the
armor - hence its many changes over the years. This doc also covers
various key characters and storylines in excellent detail with
several people who worked on the title over the years talking about
their contribution to the mythos. This is a very well done overview
of the comic book.
"Wired: The Visual Effects of Iron Man" examines the CGI work that
went into realizing Iron Man's powers, like flying, his repulsors,
and so on. Director Jon Favreau says that he likes to use practical
effects whenever possible, which is wonderfully refreshing to hear,
and in this film he mixed the practical with CGI.
"Robert Downey Jr. Screen Test." Incredibly, the actor had to do a
screen test because the studio deemed him a risky proposition and
this footage shows that he had a handle on the character very early
on.
"The Actor's Process" features fascinating footage of Jeff Bridges
and Downey rehearsing a scene with Favreau. It's great to see these
guys at work and offers insight into how they put together a scene
from the film from an acting point-of-view.
"The Onion's Wildly Popular Iron Man Trailer to be Adapted into
Full-Length Film" is a funny satire where a newscaster "breaks" a
story of how the Iron Man trailer will be made into a film that
pokes fun at the rabid nature of the hardcore fanbase of the
character.
Finally, there are "Galleries," featuring concept art, technology
stills, behind-the-scenes photographs, and poster art.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Iron Man - Wrapped and Ready
for Christmas (2008)
Buy cheap Iron Man - Wrapped and Ready for Christmas
(2008) now.
Date Published: Dec 17, 2011 - 4:36 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)I seem to be in a minority, but I thought this
was a superb movie, a great start to 2011 (countering what Rebecca
Murray said about the movie). Was it the greatest movie of all
time? Not by a long shot, no. But it accomplished what it set out
to do: it told a great story, showcased great performances both
dramatically and musically.
While Paltrow may take first-billing, and while her musical numbers
are phenomenal, to me it is Beau and Chiles (Hedlund and Meester)
who this movie is really about.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
Country Strong
(2010)
Buy cheap Country Strong (2010) now.
Date Published: Dec 15, 2011 - 12:50 am

Average Reviews:

(More customer
reviews)For the record, "A Perfect Murder" is a remake
of "Dial M for Murder," Alfred Hitchcock's maliciously clever but
hopelessly stagebound adaptation of the popular play by Frederick
Knott. But it is great deal more fun to view the new movie as a
sequel to "Wall Street," with Michael Douglas once again in top
form as a ruthlessly manipulative financial whiz. Imagine Gordon
Gekko just a few years past his prime as a high-flying corporate
raider, with a trophy wife who's just beginning to tarnish, and
you'll get the idea. The big difference is, this time, instead of
extolling the virtues of greed, Douglas' character is willing to
consider the benefits of an even deadlier sin.
In "A Perfect Murder," which Andrew Davis ("The Fugitive") has
directed from a screenplay by Patrick Smith Kelly, Douglas is
Steven Taylor, a Manhattan-based millionaire industrialist who has
over-extended himself while playing the international money
markets. Worse, he knows that his most prized possession -- Emily
(Gwyneth Paltrow), his radiantly beautiful and conspicuously
younger wife -- is drifting out of his jealously tight grip.
Right from the start, the audience knows that Emily is having an
affair with David (Viggo Mortensen), a broodingly hunky artist who
invites her to his fashionably seedy downtown loft for afternoon
delights. Trouble is, Steven also knows about the affair. This,
too, is made clear very early in the story, as Steven and Emily
share a drink in their luxurious apartment before attending a
gallery opening. Despite all their polite chit-chat, there is an
edge of menace in the air. When Steven abruptly suggests that she
wear another dress to the occasion, his words have the unmistakable
sound of a command. Not surprisingly, Emily does as she's told.
At the gallery opening, Steven is effortlessly gracious as his wife
introduces him to David, whom she identifies as a casual
acquaintance. Of course, he's much more than that -- much more, in
fact, than even Emily realizes.
After inviting himself to David's loft, Steven reverts to his
natural state. He knows that David is an ex-convict who taught
himself to paint in prison -- and, more important, has mastered the
art of seducing, then robbing, rich women. Sounding very much like
a hard-bargaining businessman, Steven wastes little time in making
his pitch: He offers David $500,000 to kill Emily. For a few
minutes, David rejects the offer. But the money -- coupled with the
threat of exposure -- is too tempting to resist.
It would be difficult to say more about what happens next without
running the risk of spilling some beans. Even if you've already
seen Hitchcock's 1954 original, or one of the many revivals of
Knott's play, you are in for a few surprises. Davis and Kelly treat
"Dial M for Murder" more as a source of inspiration than a classic
worthy of replication. They take the play's basic set-up -- the
husband concocts a tricky murder scheme that hinges on the
placement of a latchkey and the ringing of a telephone -- but go
off in a different, far more intriguing direction.
Perhaps the most striking difference between Hitchcock's film and
Davis' update is the casually amoral cynicism that informs "A
Perfect Murder." In the 1954 thriller, the wife's lover was a
boyishly buoyant mystery writer, affably played by Robert Cummings,
while the wife -- played by Hitchcock's favorite leading lady,
Grace Kelly -- was a relatively innocent adulteress who generated
sympathy while paying for her sins. Even the cuckolded husband,
played by Ray Milland, came across as genial rogue who was
motivated by love as much as money.
Welcome to the 1990s: In "A Perfect Murder," the lover is a con man
with a gift for blackmail, the husband has lust in his heart for
his wife's trust fund, and even the wife is a strong believer in
enlightened self-interest. You won't feel excessive sympathy for
any of these characters as they hatch their plots and
counter-plots. In fact, you may think one of them gets off far too
easily in the end. But with the lead roles cast so effectively, and
the plot twisting so cleverly, you likely will wind up feeling
that, unlike Steven, you've gotten your money's worth.
Click
Here to see more reviews about:
A Perfect Murder :
Widescreen Edition
DVD
Buy cheap A Perfect Murder : Widescreen Edition
now.
Date Published: Dec 14, 2011 - 10:32 am