When our new knowledge of DNA permitted genetically modified crops,
the environmental movement flipped out. Here was a new technology
that promised to raise crop yields, protect our food supply from
pests, and create a second Green Revolution for overpopulated
places such as Africa and India. The activists believed viscerally
that more food would mean more peopleand they were apparently
terrified that more little brown and yellow people would use up
such resources as copper and antelope.The Green Movement and
others, who firmly believed in the power of The Population Bomb to
destroy society, wanted to believe that population growth would be
stopped by famineby the implacable limits to food production. The
activists have never admitted, even to themselves, that the first
Green Revolution not only saved millions of human lives, but also
has been humanitys greatest conservation triumph by preventing the
plowdown of additional wildlands equal to the land area of South
America. Additionally, the increased global food security led to
lower birth rates over most of the world.Today, in Europe, green
activists have gotten biotech plantings virtually barred. Europe
has been blessed with a food surplus and their public feels no need
to feed the rest of the world. Now the Green Movement has finally
hit on a winning biotech strategy for America. The Greens tell a
federal judge that pollen from biotech crops will pollute nearby
organic fields with genetically modified DNA. The judge says, We
cant have that, and issues a court order. Both biotech alfalfa and
sugar beets have recently run afoul of these court decisions.Note
to judges the organic standards say nothing about biotech pollen
being a pollutant. They regulate the process, not the outcome. If
the farmer doesnt use industrial fertilizer or synthetic
chemicalsand doesnt plant biotech seeds himselfthe organic standard
says his produce is organicNor do traces of GM pollen significantly
affect the crops. The National Academy of Sciences has repeatedly
published their conclusion that theres no basis for regulating
genespliced crops any differently than any other crops. Ditto the
America Medical Association, the British Royal Society, and the UNs
Food and Agriculture and World Health Organizations.Experience is
showing that selectively modified seeds, using the new DNA mapping
tools, are actually safer than the older plant breeding techniques
of bombarding seeds with harsh chemicals or radiationto induce
unknown new DNA mutations.A few of the advances already achieved by
biotech A new potato thats resistant to the dreaded late blight.
Another new potato with 60 percent more protein. Nitrogenefficient
crops that yield a full crop with half the normal dose of nitrogen,
making them cheaper to grow and providing protection to streams
from runoff. Bananas resistant to the Black Sigatoka disease that
threatens the food supply of millions in Africa. Cotton plants that
have their pesticide bred in, so the fields arent sprayed and Third
World farmers arent walking through their own spray patterns. Seeds
with stacked pestkilling traits to eliminate crop spraying and
prevent the development of resistant weeds and insects.These
innovations are already making a difference. Chinas higheryielding
pestprotected cotton seeds have freed another 600,000 hectares of
land for food crops. Millions of tons of chemicals have not been
sprayed. A huge amount of soil erosion has not occurred.In America,
organic farms produce only 1 percent of our food. Should that tiny
minority threaten the whole worlds food production future How do
the green movements of Europe and America influence the governments
of the third world Easy! The EU threatens to boycott their
exports.Solid prediction The world in 2040 will have perhaps 8
billion people demanding twice as much food and lots of highquality
protein. Either we produce that extra food on the land we already
farm, or we watch the most massive loss of wildlands in all
history.How come the Green Movement isnt worried about that
Date Published: