caption id alignalignleft width210 captionMilitary officers are
briefed on battle plans in Afghanistan. Photo DoD img
srchttpcdn2b.examiner.comsitesdefaultfilesstyleslargehashdbe8dbe8afe0d312844812368eaaab56d98e.jpg
alt width210 height141 captionWhen announcinghis surge plan to
send30,000 moretroops into Afghanistan more than a year ago,
President BarackObama promised to begin withdrawal no later than
July 2011. However, slowly but surely Obamaadministration officials
arebacktracking from that date.For example, White House Press
Secretary Robert Gibbs announced regarding Afghanistan, were going
to get in there quickly and deliver a punch quickly.Many believe
Gibbs intentionallyleft reporters and the public with the
impression that Obama was taking the 2011 timeline seriously in
terms of pushing a troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. Similarly,
Vice President Joe Biden recently explained that in July of 2011,
youre going to see a whole lot of people moving out of Afghanistan.
Bidens promise was seconded by Obamas thenChief of Staff, Rahm
Emanuel.Those in the know will acknowledge thata withdrawal of U.S
troops is contingent upon the capability of Afghanistans military
and its Afghan National Police ANP to successfully takeover the
duties now performed by U.S. and NATO forces.Developing capable
Afghan National Army forces is a key element of the U.S. and North
Atlantic Treaty Organizationled coalition effort to counter the
insurgency and create sustainable security in Afghanistan. Since
2002, the United States, with assistance from NATO and other
coalition nations, has worked to develop the ANA. The Department of
Defense leads U.S. efforts to train and equip the ANA.U.S. agencies
have allocated about 20 billion in support of the ANA since 2002
and have requested 7.5 billion more for fiscal year 2011.The U.S.
Congress requested the Government Accountability Office examine the
extent of progress made and challenges faced in expanding the size
of the ANA, and the extent of progress made and challenges faced in
developing ANA capability.Congress wished the GAOto estimate future
funding needed to sustain and grow the ANA.GAO analystsreviewed DOD
and NATO documents and met with officials in Washington, D.C.
Tampa, FL Brussels, Belgium and Kabul, Afghanistan.Between January
2010 and July 2010, the ANA grew from 104,000 to 134,000 personnel,
reaching the interim growth goal set by the Afghan government and
international community 3 months ahead of schedule.Officials cited
increased recruitment of new soldiers and higher training capacity
as factors that enabled the growth. The ANA has also generally
achieved its goal of drawing proportionally from Afghanistans major
ethnic groups, with some key exceptions. However, the ANA faces
challenges, including high rates of attrition the loss of soldiers
from the force before they complete their contracts and
absenteeism.In particular, high attrition could impact the ANAs
ability to meet its end size goal of 171,600 by October 2011. The
Afghan government and international community have set an objective
of having the Afghan army and police lead and conduct security
operations in all Afghan provinces by the end of 2014. As of
September 2010, no ANA unit was assessed as capable of conducting
its mission independent of coalition assistance. About twothirds
were assessed as effective with limited coalition support.Efforts
to develop ANA capability have been challenged by difficulties in
staffing leadership positions and a shortage of coalition trainers,
including a shortfall of approximately 18 percent 275 of 1,495 of
the personnel needed to provide instruction at ANA training
facilities. Neither DOD nor NATO has completed an analysis of ANA
sustainment costs. Such analysis is important given that, as of
January 2010, the International Monetary Fund projected that it
will take until at least 2023 for the Afghan government to raise
sufficient revenues to cover its operating expenses, including
those related to the army highlighting Afghanistans continued
dependence on external sources of funding.In addition, DOD and NATO
studies indicate that growth of the ANA beyond the current end goal
of 171,600 may be neededpotentially up to a force size of 240,000
personnel. Any such growth will necessitate additional donor
assistance. GAO recommended that Secretary of Defense Robert Gibbs,
in conjunction with international partners, take steps to eliminate
the shortage of trainers clarify what ANA growth beyond the current
end goal, if any, is needed and develop estimates of the future
funding needed to further grow and sustain the ANA.
Date Published: