blockquoteemDHS is replacing its border security measures, which
could temporarily reduce oversight, and reports it may reduce
resources requested for securing the southwest border. GAO Report
emblockquotecaption id alignalignleft width210 captionImmigration
enforcement executives Janet Napolitano and John Morton claim the
USMexico border has never been safer. Photo DHS img
srchttpcdn2b.examiner.comsitesdefaultfilesstyleslargehashf3bcf3bca2db45e249b249820ef18751b6f9.jpg
alt width210 height113 captionOnly days after Secretary of Homeland
Security Janet Napolitano complained about law enforcement
commanders exaggerating the threat of the Mexican drug war on
Americans, two of her own Immigration amp Customs
Enforcementspecial agents were ambushed by suspected members of
Mexicos deadliest crime gang, Los Zetas.Secretary Janet Napolitano
also reported the obvious during her testimony before the U.S.
CongressThe nearly 2,000mile U.S. border with Mexico is vulnerable
to crossborder illegal activity.The Office of Border Patrol, within
DHSs U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP, is responsible for
securing the border between U.S. ports of entry and has divided
responsibility for southwest border miles dividedamong nine Border
Patrol sectors. CBP reported spending about 3 billion on Border
Patrols southwest border efforts in fiscal year 2010, apprehending
over 445,000 illegal entries.The HouseHomeland Security Committee
under the leadership of Rep. Peter King RNY requestedthe Government
Accountability Office report its observations on the extent to
which DHS reported progress in achieving operational control Border
Patrol was able to detect, respond, and interdict crossborder
illegal activity of the southwest border.In addition, the GAOwould
report onthe extent to which operational control reflects Border
Patrols ability to respond to illegal activity at the border or
after entry into the United States and how DHS reports the
transition to new border security measures will change oversight
and resource requirements for securing the southwest border.The
subsequenttestimonywas based on GAOs ongoing work for the House
Committee on Homeland Security. GAO analyzed DHS border security
documents and data supporting border security measures reported by
DHS for fiscal years 2005 through 2010, and interviewed DHS
officials.Border Patrol reported achieving varying levels of
operational control for 873 of the nearly 2,000 southwest border
miles at the end of fiscal year 2010, increasing an average of 126
miles each year from fiscal years 2005 through 2010. Border Patrol
sector officials assessed the miles under operational control using
factors such as the numbers of illegal entries and
apprehensions.CBP attributed the increase to additional
infrastructure, technology, and personnel. Yuma sector officials
reported achieving operational control for all of its 126 border
miles however, the other eight southwest border sectors reported
achieving operational control of 11 to 86 percent of their border
miles. Border Patrol attributed the uneven progress across sectors
to multiple factors, including prioritizing resource deployment to
sectors deemed to have greater risk from illegal activity.Border
Patrol reported that its levels of operational control for most
border miles reflected its ability to respond to illegal activity
after entry into the United States and not at the immediate border.
Operational control encompassed two of the five levels used to
classify the security level of each border mile. The two levels of
control differed in the extent that Border Patrol resources were
available to either deter or detect and apprehend illegal entries
at the immediate border controlled versus a multitiered deployment
of Border Patrol resources to deter, detect, and apprehend illegal
entries after entry into the United States.GAOs preliminary
analysis of the 873 border miles under operational control in 2010
showed that about 129 miles 15 percent were classified as
controlled and the remaining 85 percent were classified as
managed.Border Patrol officialsstated that operational control does
not require its agents to be able to detect and apprehend all
illegal entries. Yuma sector reported operational control for all
its miles although Border Patrol did not have the ability to detect
and apprehend illegal entries that use ultralight aircraft and
tunnels. DHS is replacing its border security measures, which could
temporarily reduce oversight, and reports it may reduce resources
requested for securing the southwest border.Border Patrol had
established border miles under effective control as a measure of
border security. DHS plans to improve the quality of boarder
security measures by developing new measures with a more
quantitative methodology. CBP is developing a new methodology and
measures for border security, which CBP expects to be in place by
fiscal year 2012. In the meantime, the absence of border security
outcome measures in DHSs Fiscal Year 20102012 Annual Performance
Report could reduce oversight.CBP does not have an estimate of the
time and efforts needed to secure the border however, DHS, CBP, and
Border Patrol headquarters officials said that this new approach to
border security is expected to be more flexible and costeffective.
As a result, Border Patrol headquarters officials expect that they
will request fewer resources to secure the border. For example, the
socalled virtual fence project has been canceled after the U.S.
government spentupwards of a billion dollars on security measures
that either didnt work as promised or the equipment malfunctioned
within weeksof being installed.
Date Published: