Summary: Adultery and Politics
When Bill Clinton was caught up in that messy bit of monkey business with Monica Lewinsky, liberals and the French sprang quickly to his defense. The French, especially, couldn’t wait to sneer at us for our obvious lack of sophistication, although their linguists, to their credit, expressed some contempt for Clinton’s apparent inability to define “is.”
Read more on Adultery and Politics…
img classalignright
srchttpstatic.stuff.co.nz12551191435472951547.jpg alt width143
height172 When Bill Clinton was caught up in that messy bit of
monkey business with Monica Lewinsky, liberals and the French
sprang quickly to his defense. The French, especially, couldnt wait
to sneer at us for our obvious lack of sophistication, although
their linguists, to their credit, expressed some contempt for
Clintons apparent inability to define is.The French feel that a man
without a mistress is something of a freak. In fact, if it ever got
out that a French politician didnt have a woman or two tucked away,
the Parisian press would label him a sissy boy or, worse yet, an
American.By the time Clinton rolled around, most of us were aware
that John Kennedy had had his hands on more Hollywood starlets than
costume designer Edith Head. Still, in spite of that, our
politicians at least so long as theyre Republicans are dead in the
water if theyve been discovered wandering off the reservation.Thats
why I find it so absurd that anyone, including Newt Gingrich,
thinks Newt Gingrich has even the slightest chance of garnering the
GOP presidential nomination in 2012. After two divorces, each the
result of his philandering, the man is carting around more baggage
than a redcap.I realize that there are many people who would argue
that a mans sex life has nothing to do with his ability to govern.
They would point out that, at least for those of us who have no
plans to be intimately involved with them, how they perform with
their clothes on is a darn sight more important than how they
perform with their clothes off.The counterargument is that the
president of the United States isnt just its chief executive or
even just its commanderinchief he is the living, breathing symbol
of the nation. And as symbols go, a guy whose zipper is always at
halfmast isnt most peoples ideal.The way I see it, we dont really
know the politicians who represent us. We may see them on TV or
even at meetandgreet events, but that merely tells us what they
look like, what they sound like and whether, without a
Teleprompter, they can utter a coherent sentence.Therefore, we cant
pretend to know what sort of people they are anymore than we can
evaluate the character of those actors, singers and dancers, we see
performing in the movies or on the tube.Unfortunately, except when
politicians have been caught taking bribes, dealing drugs or voting
for ObamaCare, one of the few salient facts that ever reach us is
when theyre discovered carrying on adulterous affairs.Perhaps the
French would dismiss us as a nation of nave rubes, but the
prevailing attitude is if these guys dont have a problem cheating
on their spouses, those people to whom they have pledged their
eternal fidelity, why the hell should we trust thememem2011 a
hrefmailtoBurtPrelutskyaol.comBurt Prelutskya
Date Published: