Opinions about astrological
prediction are generally divided. In
fact, both views are based on a misunderstanding of the nature of
how astrology really works.
Though it may come as a surprise to the true believer many
astrologers believe that astrology cannot make precise
predictions about your
future although astrology can indeed reveal the tendencies of your
future.
If an astrologer tells you that next Tuesday you
will be walking down the street, and will accidentally trip and
fall, breaking your left wrist as it cracks against a fire hydrant,
that would be a pretty precise
prediction, wouldn't it. But no
astrologer ever makes
predictions like that. More likely,
an astrologer would say: There is some danger of having an accident
next Tuesday; try to be more careful than usual. This is of course
not a precise
prediction, but rather a statement,
based on certain astrological techniques, about an increased
probability of a certain type of event occurring. This is the true
strength of astrology: not to tell you what is going to happen
(since that is beyond its capabilities), but rather, to inform you
about the probablilit9es of certain types of events occurring.
Astrology isn’t used to predict the future. It’s used to help you
gain insight and understanding into the patterns and directions
your life takes. It’s not an absolute, but it’s an indicator. If
you don’t like what your astrological or natal charts tell you,
it’s certainly within your power to change it. Astrology can give
you insight into one potential destiny, but there are too many
variables, including the decisions you make for yourself, to
predict with any degree of accuracy what will happen in the
future.
2012 bible prophecies |
end of the
world
Date Published: Feb 23, 2011 - 11:10 pm
“We’re gonna win the game, I guarantee it.”
Do you recognize that quote? If you don’t, you should. This is
probably the greatest
prediction ever made by a player, in
a time when player
predictions actually meant
something. Who is the player, you ask? None other than Joe Namath,
predicting the outcome of Super Bowl III. The New York Jets were
facing off against the Baltimore Colts and were 10-point underdogs.
The brash young QB would follow through on his
prediction, winning 1969’s big game
16-7. His boldness was innovative and would be copied time and
again throughout sports history by some of the game’s greatest
athletes. Recently, however, this trend has gotten a little out of
hand.
“I know we goin’ win. I know we goin’ bust they ass. Tomorrow night
is the last game here in this building this year. Y’all can quote
me, put it back page, front page, whatever.”
Now I know most of you know who this is. It’s Detroit’s Rasheed
Wallace giving his usual playoff
prediction. This
prediction came after a Game Three
loss to the Cleveland Cavaliers and Lebron James. Rasheed was
pretty much explaining, in his own crazy language, that the Pistons
would defeat the Cavs in Game Four and wrap up the series back home
in Game Five. Wallace’s
predictions have become so common
that writers have coined the phrase ‘guaransheed’ to explain his
constant
predictions.
This is Wallace’s fourth such
prediction and there is one problem.
The Pistons lost Game Four. This forces me to bring forth the
ultimate question; do player
predictions mean anything
anymore?
I have thought long and hard about this topic and came up with a
checklist of sorts to see if this ‘guaransheed’ actually
constitutes a meaningful
prediction.
First off, if you are trying to be bold and make a
prediction, you or your team must be
the underdog in the contest.
Nope. Sorry Rasheed, but your team is the heavy favorite to win the
NBA Championship. This in no way constitutes the Detroit Pistons as
the underdog against the fourth seed Cleveland Cavaliers. No one on
this Pistons team should be making any guarantees, unless they find
themselves down in a playoff series, and that is very unlikely to
happen now.
Second, what does a guarantee mean if the game that is being
predicted is not the championship? My answer: absolutely
nothing.
You have come up short once again Rasheed. This is the second round
of the playoffs, not even the Conference Finals. Save your
predictions for that
round, or even better, the NBA Finals. A second round
prediction, especially when your
team is up 2-1 games, means absolutely nothing to me.
Finally, make sure you come through with solid play in the game you
made a
prediction about.
There is nothing more embarrassing than predicting a victory and
then having a less than stellar performance. Ask Seahawks TE Jeremy
Stevens, he’ll tell you.
Would you believe it that Rasheed falls short once again? I would
hardly call 7 points and 3 turnovers a stellar performance. Simply
said, Wallace talked the talk but did not walk the walk in Game
Four.
So let’s sum up what we have learned today. The Pistons are heavy
favorites to win this series, Wallace’s
prediction did not come true during
an all-important game, and Rasheed had a pretty poor performance in
Game Four. To add further insult to injury, the Pistons actually
lost the game. Rasheed’s
predictions have come to mean
absolutely nothing and these types of player
predictions have become a real
problem. If you can think all the way back to the first round of
the playoffs, Ron Artest made a similar bogus
prediction, but for different
reasons. He predicted the Kings would win the championship; only
the Kings were the eighth seed and no one took them seriously.
Especially after they lost in round one to the Spurs. Some other
athletes actually make
predictions just to pump themselves
up. A classic example is Joey Porter, the linebacker from the
Pittsburg Steelers. Before the 2006 Super Bowl, Porter made all
kinds of
predictions for
the sole purpose of giving his team reasons to win the game. If
these
predictions and
trash talking are the only way to get pumped up for the SuperBowl,
you have a serious problem.
I am going to close with one important message to all athletes such
as these. Leave the
prediction making to the experts and
the media. We, like you, might not know what we are talking about,
but at least we get paid for it. All your bogus
predictions about games that aren’t
very significant are just diluting your importance and turning you
into a circus act. The next time I hear a player
prediction, I’ll know it’s more
valuable as entertainment than actual information.
2012 |
2012 dire gnosis
Date Published: Feb 23, 2011 - 11:10 pm